How can you watch the Ouma and Stevens vs GGG fights and...

[Jloro]

Explain...

lol I was just doing what the poster golokin did to Martinez

This is why you don't bother arguing with Jloro...most delusional of the GGG haters.

OKay

[pesticid]

It's so easy to dismiss a fighter based on a few bad moments.
It's like Floyd was getting clipped by Emanuel Augustus and then he stopped him.
Floyd was getting hit silly by Demarcous Corley and I thik he finally tkoed him in the 11th.

Now, we're talking about the best defensive fighter in the past 10 years.

Here comes in Ouma who is arguably a much better figher than Corley and Augustus getting stopped and beat down whose only clear loss was against Roman Karmazin. So GGG got hit for a couple of rounds against a southpow and I think Ouma was GGG's first southpow opponent in his professional career. Kev is truely reaching.

Let's go back to Froch's fight against Taylor and Pascal - how about that Kev? Two chinny guys with less power, less skills and worse chins.

You see you can make anything bad especially with your BS percentage stats about CS's conenct &. Guy lands like 2 out of 6 power punches and he's landing lamost 50% and that's at the elite level is almost like 100%. What kind of hash are you smoking. It is BS non-stop but not everybody is that naive to buy into what you're selling.

[rr00676]

OKay

your just butt hurt by the way NSB crucified Quillin after the Rosado fight

[-Kev-]

Johnson used that shell more so because he didn't have the legs to stick to him, which Golovkin does. That fight still shone a light on Froch's inability to fight inside because Froch never opted to stay close, have a closer view on the openings and work around Johnson's guard. He was force to fight behind a stick and be ineffective entirely, granted enough to win but still.

I think regardless, Froch blasting Bute, fighting two close fights with Kessler, beating Pascal, knocking out Taylor last minute, and beating Johnson are all better fighters than Golovkin at the time he fought them. If Froch beats Golovkin, this is how i'd rank his resume.

Kessler
Pascal
Taylor
Bute(Win over Bika, Andrade and Grachev do it for me)
Golovkin
Johnson(age)

Taylor was still an excellent fighter when Froch beat him. Stamina was his downfall, he had the fight in the bag including the only fighter to KD Froch. It was a very good, dominating performance for Taylor up until the disastrous 12th round.

[AKAcronym]

lol I was just doing what the poster golokin did to Martinez



OKay

I see. Hard to tell sometimes what peoples intentions are. I try not to get involved with debates but every now and then I interject. Can tell some people lose sleep over what's negatively said about a certain fighter they like.

[-Kev-]

It's so easy to dismiss a fighter based on a few bad moments.
It's like Floyd was getting clipped by Emanuel Augustus and then he stopped him.
Floyd was getting hit silly by Demarcous Corley and I thik he finally tkoed him in the 11th.

Now, we're talking about the best defensive fighter in the past 10 years.

Here comes in Ouma who is arguably a much better figher than Corley and Augustus getting stopped and beat down whose only clear loss was against Roman Karmazin. So GGG got hit for a couple of rounds against a southpow and I think Ouma was GGG's first southpow opponent in his professional career. Kev is truely reaching.

Let's go back to Froch's fight against Taylor and Pascal - how about that Kev? Two chinny guys with less power, less skills and worse chins.

You see you can make anything bad especially with your BS percentage stats about CS's conenct &. Guy lands like 2 out of 6 power punches and he's landing lamost 50% and that's at the elite level is almost like 100%. What kind of hash are you smoking. It is BS non-stop but not everybody is that naive to buy into what you're selling.

I don't understand the obsession in comparing an early 20's Floyd 10+ years ago and a early 30s Golovkin's performances of recent years-present(2 years).

Floyd absolutely changed, and had the luxury of going through his rocky moments early in his career from 2002-2004. There is absolutely no comparison. None at all.

Golovkin is not in his early 20s, Golovkin does not have 10+ years ahead of him like Floyd had, and Golovkin certainly can not afford to f-ck up against C level fighters at this point. And Corley was actually a very good fighter t the time, better than Ouma. You may be seeing his record now, but he only had 2 losses when Floyd fought him.

Please, do no be cornballs and bring Floyd. There is no comparison and you will only end up embarrassing GG.

[bojangles1987]

How can you watch Martinez/Macklin, Martinez/Murray, Martinez/Barker, and Golovkin/Macklin, and think Martinez easily beats Golovkin?

Froch, I agree about. Maybe Golovkin can win, but he's never fought anyone like Froch and he's not that big, he'd be the underdog for me and hopefully the betting public would be smart enough to do the same. Kessler, I don't know. Not sure where he is at this point in his career.

[Jloro]

I see. Hard to tell sometimes what peoples intentions are. I try not to get involved with debates but every now and then I interject. Can tell some people lose sleep over what's negatively said about a certain fighter they like.

I tend to have fun with it every so often lol

your just butt hurt by the way NSB crucified Quillin after the Rosado fight

A little bit yes, since his performance was not even a bad one lol

[Dirk Diggler UK]

How can you watch your boy Sergia get beat by Margarito, go thru life and death with Kelly "Alcoholic" Pavlik and get knocked around like a ragdoll by a high weeded up version of Chave lol and still think GGG wouldn't absolutely destroy him? LOL, get real.

Those guys.....even Chavez Jr.....are better than anyone Golovkin has ever faced.

[AKAcronym]

I tend to have fun with it every so often lol

Haha I've been able to see that.