Meh.. both are talented but undeserving, IMO, of being in the top ten p4p rankings
If anyone has Broner top 10 pfp, shouldn't they have Mikey higher??
Collapse
-
Comment
-
Hilarious.
He fought the absolute dregs of the division for them "titles".
Talk about a paper 3 weight World champion.Comment
-
Didn't know Demarco, the highest ranked fighter in the division, was a dreg. Not sure how that works.Comment
-
Comment
-
1. That does not change the fact that Demarco was the top rated fighter in the division.
2. Valero was never able to knock demarco down or even really stun him. Broner did.
3. Both demarco and Broner weighed about the same weight on fight night. So that argument is weak.Comment
-
Comment
-
Ok and? A lot of fighters lost to Khan. Ppl forget that khan was widely favored to beat Danny Garcia prior to their fight. In fact khan was considered the best fighter in the division at the time. Hindsight is 20/20. I never thought highly of khan but he was a top fighter at 140.Comment
-
1. That does not change the fact that the division was pure excrement and the weakest it had ever been.1. That does not change the fact that Demarco was the top rated fighter in the division.
2. Valero was never able to knock demarco down or even really stun him. Broner did.
3. Both demarco and Broner weighed about the same weight on fight night. So that argument is weak.
2. Valero destroyed the poor lad and he was never the same since.
3. I'd like to see some evidence.Comment
-
1. Doesn't change the fact that he was a legit champion. Nothing paper about beating him.
2. Valero ruined him and he proceeded to get the two best wins of his career? Dude just stop. Ur exactly what's wrong with this site. Losing one fight doesn't make u ruined, that makes no sense.
3. U don't believe me, look it up. I'm not your researcher. But if us ont know something u shouldn't just make it up, demarco was a huge 135lber no different than broner.Comment
Comment