1. Doesn't change the fact that he was a legit champion. Nothing paper about beating him.
2. Valero ruined him and he proceeded to get the two best wins of his career? Dude just stop. Ur exactly what's wrong with this site. Losing one fight doesn't make u ruined, that makes no sense.
3. U don't believe me, look it up. I'm not your researcher. But if us ont know something u shouldn't just make it up, demarco was a huge 135lber no different than broner.
I urge you to find me a three weight world championship reign worse then: Perez, Escobedo, Rees, De Marco and Malignaggi.
I urge you to find me a three weight world championship reign worse then: Perez, Escobedo, Rees, De Marco and Malignaggi.
Maybe u need to reread what I said. I never said his reign was spectacular. Our argument was exclusively about demarco and simply put u were wrong. He wasn't a paper titlist nor was he damaged goods and there was no significant weight advantage to speak of. I had previously stated that broners' 3 weight reign wasn't that special. Mw be u should look through the thread and find it.
At this point I think both guys are around #15 and neither guy is far from each other. Saturday may have given the edge to Mikey Garcia. Neither guy is top 10 though.
Comment