The GGG hate is outstanding

[Foreign Soil]

Crawford ain't even that slick, he's been getting hit against these guys who aren't exactly stellar fighters. If you come forward, you're going to get hit anyway. I wouldn't want to be labeled slick as it usually means you can't punch so you have to waste large portions of a fight to keep the other guy from punching you thus giving the impression that you have a skinny sack of balls, and that's not good.

[Khmelnytsky]

And that's my concern

GGG is about the same height as Abraham, but not as solidly built

People forget easily, but Abraham was considered a real beast, he was favourite to win the super 6, and most thought he would knock froch out, and he got manhandled in that fight and looked so small in there, Abrahams excuse.... "he was just so much bigger than me"

I can envision a similar situation with Golovkin

It had nothing to do with Abraham lacking power at 168 it had to do with him not possessing the skill necessary to deliver it especially against skilled bigger opponents. Abraham always had a very low workrate and when you punch him he just puts his guard up and doesnt throw back. He was always a very limited boxer.

[Daddy T]

they hate him because of the threat he poses to their favorite fighters. They want him to fail, want him to be 'exposed' etc and so they keep saying it will happen/saying it did happen etc in some weird way I guess they think if they say it enough and loudly enough people will believe it or something. Bottom line he is PDG - Pretty Damn Good

[IronDanHamza]

Why is it when a fighter shows flaws and they're highlighted by someone it's considered "hate"?

[Foreign Soil]

Why is it when a fighter shows flaws and they're highlighted by someone it's considered "hate"?

Because it's mostly redundant. GGG gets hit a few times and the haters think they see something through their specially designed hater glasses and come across with the idea that a TKO 8 is a worse outcome than a lucky win against Murray, for example.

[Weebler I]

they hate him because of the threat he poses to their favorite fighters. They want him to fail, want him to be 'exposed' etc and so they keep saying it will happen/saying it did happen etc in some weird way I guess they think if they say it enough and loudly enough people will believe it or something. Bottom line he is PDG - Pretty Damn Good

He will lose tho because he'll consistently fight the best possible opponents. That's just what happens, there are no super-humans out there.

It's like Froch says, if you're undefeated in boxing you just haven't fought the guys you're supposed to fight.

[Foreign Soil]

I agree with that. Nobody should be undefeated in this sport. If you are, then something's wrong.

[illmaticfighter]

im just not sold on him yet his best win is matthew macklin just like im not sold on terrance crawford ,lomachenko and broner(if he beats maidana i will be.


just like everybody wasn't sold on canelo till he beat trout.

if ggg beats martin murray i'll admit he's legit and if he get the sergio fight then he's definitely p4p.

[IronDanHamza]

Because it's mostly redundant. GGG gets hit a few times and the haters think they see something through their specially designed hater glasses and come across with the idea that a TKO 8 is a worse outcome than a lucky win against Murray, for example.

Not really.

Despite winning with ease he showed some flaws against a fighter who shouldn't have even been in the ring with him.

[DoubleMM]

Not really.

Despite winning with ease he showed some flaws against a fighter who shouldn't have even been in the ring with him.

what flaws? This was an easy fight for him.