Tonight of all nights is definitely not the time for a triangle theory.
Ok, forget the triangle theory. We all saw the new and improve version of Marquez put Pacquiao to sleep with a basic counter. Grant it he failed to capitalize on it in the 3 previous fights but those fights were competitive because of Marquez. We saw last night Bradley beat the new and improve Marquez with a watered down version of Mayweather's style. Mayweather beating all three IMO is not a leap... It's a slight hop.
If the counter was so basic, why did it take over 40 rounds to land it?
Because that one dimension is what gives Pac problems. Have you ever heard of styles make fights?
JMM just has the style that gives Pacman hell.
Pacman plays right into his style, aggressive fighter and JMM is a matador.
I study a lot of fights its why my prediction ratio is pretty high.
I picked Bradley over JMM, JMM over Pacquiao by ko, Lucas ko Dallas Jr, Klitschko over Povetkin, Cotto knocking out Delvin, Floyd out boxing Canelo, and Danny Garcia beating Lucas, just to name a few.
I study the fights unbiasedly.
THAT IS EVEN WORSE! So you cannot beat a guy that basically does the same thing for 12 Rounds?
IMAGE#1
WTF does that say about you and your Skills or the lack their of? You guys use absolutely NO LOGIC on this forum most of you are just ALL PRIDE!
BRADLEY looked more impressive against JMM than Pacquiao did in all 4 of their fights
Pac is 2-1-1 JMM and due to an error that was admitted by a judge, should actually be 3-1.
Boxing fan that hates on one of the most exciting fighters in recent memory. Come out the closet already.
I could never "HATE" Pacquiao, very classy guy, and a WARRIOR I never have any problems what so ever giving him props when it is deserving and you cannot find a post with me ever talking bad about Pacquiao
I am a BOXING FAN FIRST not just here as a FAN OF ONE BOXER!
Truth be told, Pacquiao made Marquez. And I'm talking before the KO. If there was no Pacquiao, there wouldn't had been any Marquez.
Remember the Fedchenko fight? JMM ****** too.
Btw he doesn't just have problems with slick black boxers. He also has problems with slick Asian boxers, Chris John and Pacquiao.
Posted from Boxingscene.com App for Android
you are correct. Nobody wanted to fight JMM, remember how he was labeled the avoided one at the time? super difficult to fight and if you fought him you were forced to attack him because he would never move forward and he would counter you all night. Prince Naseem ducked him, Pacman gave him the shot, Pac said *** it give me the best at 126 ill fight him.
you are correct. Nobody wanted to fight JMM, remember how he was labeled the avoided one at the time? super difficult to fight and if you fought him you were forced to attack him because he would never move forward and he would counter you all night. Prince Naseem ducked him, Pacman gave him the shot, Pac said *** it give me the best at 126 ill fight him.
Gave him 3 rematches too, bitter mofo was never happy. Always been jealous of Pacquiao.
THAT IS EVEN WORSE! So you cannot beat a guy that basically does the same thing for 12 Rounds?
WTF does that say about you and your Skills or the lack their of? You guys use absolutely NO LOGIC on this forum most of you are just ALL PRIDE!
BRADLEY looked more impressive against JMM than Pacquiao did in all 4 of their fights
A lot of guys looked more impressive than Ali vs Norton, and as overrated he may be, JMM is still higher caliber than Norton or Tarver or Junior Jones.
Comment