Pacquiao is multi dimensional, JMM is one dimensional

[.:: JSFD26 ::.]

Truth be told, Pacquiao made Marquez. And I'm talking before the KO. If there was no Pacquiao, there wouldn't had been any Marquez.

Remember the Fedchenko fight? JMM ****** too.

Btw he doesn't just have problems with slick black boxers. He also has problems with slick Asian boxers, Chris John and Pacquiao.


Posted from Boxingscene.com App for Android

[BKM-2010]

JMM would be nothing without Pac. He's another Tarver and Norton. Relies on one guy's greatness who is nice enough to keep giving him rematches. Otherwise his one dimensional style has him losing and in fits before he gives the usual whiny, hissy fits about robberies.

[HarvardBlue]

Tonight of all nights is definitely not the time for a triangle theory.

Ok, forget the triangle theory. We all saw the new and improve version of Marquez put Pacquiao to sleep with a basic counter. Grant it he failed to capitalize on it in the 3 previous fights but those fights were competitive because of Marquez. We saw last night Bradley beat the new and improve Marquez with a watered down version of Mayweather's style. Mayweather beating all three IMO is not a leap... It's a slight hop.

[Guamar]

Pacquiao is definitely talented, but he can't be as multidimensional as you claim considering that in four tries he's been unable to get a victory over Marquez without help from the judges, and was knocked out cold in the last fight. The thing is, Pac has natural advantages over Marquez like his blazing hand and foot speed which match up well against Bradley. Nevertheless, Marquez managed to neutralize Pac's physical advantages with his superior technique and intellect.

And although Marquez lost last night, let's not forget that we're talking about a 40 year old veteran who'd shown signs of decline and had become more stationary since his move up to lightweight, but to his credit, he was able to make adjustments to remain competitive, which many fighters are unable to do. Fighters who rely heavily on their physical abilities tend to decline dramatically once they begin to slow down physically-- I don't think it's a coincidence that Pac tripped face first into Marquez's counter in his last fight after complaining of leg problems in previous fights.

At any rate, perhaps we would have seen a different outcome last night if this had been a younger and fresher version of Marquez. Nevertheless, he gave a respectable performance all things considered.

[straightleft]

Pacquiao is definitely talented, but he can't be as multidimensional as you claim considering that in four tries he's been unable to get a victory over Marquez without help from the judges, and was knocked out cold in the last fight. The thing is, Pac has natural advantages over Marquez like his blazing hand and foot speed which match up well against Bradley. Nevertheless, Marquez managed to neutralize Pac's physical advantages with his superior technique and intellect.

And although Marquez lost last night, let's not forget that we're talking about a 40 year old veteran who'd shown signs of decline and had become more stationary since his move up to lightweight, but to his credit, he was able to make adjustments to remain competitive, which many fighters are unable to do. Fighters who rely heavily on their physical abilities tend to decline dramatically once they begin to slow down physically-- I don't think it's a coincidence that Pac tripped face first into Marquez's counter in his last fight after complaining of leg problems in previous fights.

At any rate, perhaps we would have seen a different outcome last night if this had been a younger and fresher version of Marquez. Nevertheless, he gave a respectable performance all things considered.

You are an idiot alt sir. Pac won all the 3 fights except the 4. Just because Marquez was crying from Mexico to USA up to Philippines it doesn't mean he won all the fights.

[Public_Enemy]

Both guys are multidimensional in my view. Most fighters have their struggles with a certain style. It's just the nature of the game.

[hugh grant]

Pacs offense was so good that his opponents learnt to just backtrack or run and not take risks now.
So mostly Pac has to chase and lunge and look off balance as he does all the work. His opponents wont let him have any kind of a plan, they just survive as best they can while not taking risks and trying to duke it out.

[sicko]

Because that one dimension is what gives Pac problems. Have you ever heard of styles make fights?

JMM just has the style that gives Pacman hell.

Pacman plays right into his style, aggressive fighter and JMM is a matador.

I study a lot of fights its why my prediction ratio is pretty high.

I picked Bradley over JMM, JMM over Pacquiao by ko, Lucas ko Dallas Jr, Klitschko over Povetkin, Cotto knocking out Delvin, Floyd out boxing Canelo, and Danny Garcia beating Lucas, just to name a few.

I study the fights unbiasedly.

THAT IS EVEN WORSE! So you cannot beat a guy that basically does the same thing for 12 Rounds?


WTF does that say about you and your Skills or the lack their of? You guys use absolutely NO LOGIC on this forum most of you are just ALL PRIDE!

BRADLEY looked more impressive against JMM than Pacquiao did in all 4 of their fights

[Vasyl’s dad]

I love Pac but the Oscar fight was has the legitimacy of a WWE match

In which Oscar was the overwhelming favorite.



Posted from Boxingscene.com App for Android

[BUNGALOWS]

THAT IS EVEN WORSE! So you cannot beat a guy that basically does the same thing for 12 Rounds?


WTF does that say about you and your Skills or the lack their of? You guys use absolutely NO LOGIC on this forum most of you are just ALL PRIDE!

BRADLEY looked more impressive against JMM than Pacquiao did in all 4 of their fights

Boxing fan that hates on one of the most exciting fighters in recent memory. Come out the closet already.