Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Doug Fisher on the Margarito handwrap scandal

Collapse
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • #71
    Originally posted by edgarg View Post
    One of the VERY few intelligent comments on this subject. It was obvious from the start that there was no "plaster'. He was shaking hands in the ring after the Cotto fight; his gloves were taken off with no brilliant detectives (like the liar Big-Belly Richardson) saying ...Aha... I've been writing about this ever since I read the FULL Commission documentation which clearly showed that Margarito DID NOT KNOW anything about his wraps, that the WHOLE c****roo (I use this crude lingo because the low-mentalities here understand it better) was, according to the FIRST Comissioner who touched it "...a used gauze pad which felt as if there'd been some water drops, and slightly stiffer in spots....." That was the WHOLE piece of drek.

    You made just one error-correct me of I'm wrong- The report said that there were traces (read minute amounts) of TWO of the ingredients which could make Plaster-of-Paris. A missing component was oxygen. The report also said that these two traces were substances which were commonly used in many items around the world, especially in COSMETICS.... (think powder) Another lab report said that they were to be found in just about every kitchen on the globe.

    The penalty was because "you are the head of your team so you must take the responsibility..." Margarito was found not to have known about the used pad. Yes folks that's EXACTLY what it was...just a used gauze pad. It was supposed to be new......That was the "illegality". And THIS is why Arum, a lawyer himself, was so supportive of Margarito. He KNEW that he was getting a bad naem for no good reason.

    As for any kind of "plaster" conspiracy anywhere, all this was shattered (literally and figuratively) by the test that was done by Boxing Illustrated in the 1960s. It was to find out what merit there was in Jack Kearns' assertion in a book that he'd dipped Dempsey's wraps in water and then in plaster powder, just before his fight with Jess Willard. Cleveland Williams made the test in front of over 50 of the top experts. They did it exactly as the book described and even "hardened" the items with some heat. Williams said that from the first punch at the heavy bag he felt it crumble and after 3-4 punches they examined it and it was just broken up into powder. This was REAL PofP not "traces of 2 components".

    And...by the way.. a little investigation of Willard's supposed injuries showed that they were fiction manufactured by the press. He had NO broken jaws, ribs nor eye sockets. He gave a LONG interview to the press the very next day before noon whilst sitting in his car (with his wife and their luggage) to begin their drive home, over 800 miles. He showed a little swelling and a few bruises on his face. NOTHING MORE. I've seen the picture of that interview with Willard and his wife sitting in their car with a horde of reporters around. And he was smiling. He's just earned a huge (for the time) paycheck.

    I suppose you've all heard that after a revolution the first intention is to hang all the lawyers and newspaper reporters....

    At the time Kearns wrote the book he was broke, and trying to arouse interest in it. Not long before, he'd come into the RING office and Nat Fleischer related that he was stony-broke, and I "bought" a story from him, really just giving him $100. "Dempsey never had plaster on his wraps, the gloves were put on in the ring, I was in the dressing-room and Kearns was nowhere near. His wraps were put on by his trainer". But Dempsey did such a great job that the story immediately spread.

    I've read that there are 23 different iron ****es in museums around the world all supposed to be what Dempsey had in his glove........

    All I can say is that on THIS SITE especially, there are low-life, ignorant, malice-impelled cretins who jump on anything to denigrate an honest fighter, whenever they get the opportunity. This is what makes me sick and less and less inclined to post.
    Great post,

    Comment


    • #72
      Originally posted by Dirk Diggler UK View Post
      The rematch with Cotto was 3 and a half years later. Margarito took severe punishment against Mosley and Pacquiao. He broke a bone in his eye. He was suspended for a year and was out for a year with the injury.

      Only a tard would not take any of that into consideration.
      Cotto also took a lot of punishment in between fights also he fought pac he fought clotty he fought mayorga and yuri foreman and he does not fight anyone without taking a beating also he only fought one time in the 18 months leading up to the rematch the same amount as Margarito so don't give me the whole ring rust shnit the fact is they both fought the same fight basically both times the difference was his punches did not hurt cotto the second time that was the difference he cheated or tried to against mosley the chances are he did the fight before against cotto that's all there is to it mosley was viewed as wasged up at the time and Cotto was viewed as a real threat why would he cheat against a washed up fighter and not Cotto

      Comment


      • #73
        I do like your avitar digler OH YEAH OZIL is a stud

        Comment


        • #74
          Rubbish. This cheater Margarito knew what he was doing all along.

          Comment


          • #75
            Dougie Fisher makes a great point.

            In the second fight between Cotto/Margarito now this time with a new trainer, new strategy, Cotto was able to smoother Margaritos shots and he boxed a whole lot more. IF Cotto had stayed and ****** with Margarito like he did in the first fight, Cotto would have lost by ko once again.

            It will forever be said that a great fighter like Mayweather ducked Margarito. Let the truth be told.

            Comment


            • #76
              Originally posted by ßringer View Post
              Actually, if you use Occam's Razor correctly the hypothesis with the least amount of assumptions involved would be that Margarito didn't cheat.

              We're talking about trace substances here, specifically oxygen, which is the third most abundant element in the universe, and calcium, which is the most abundant metal by mass in most animals and is also found in chalk which is routinely used by athletes to enhance grip during weight exercises including lifting weights, pulling ropes, or even swinging a sledgehammer.

              If anybody is making an assumption here it's you.
              Originally posted by Dirk Diggler UK View Post
              Cotto is a better technical boxer than Margarito. Margarito was a better fighter and more man than Cotto, that's why he beat him.

              Me gustans estos posts

              Comment


              • #77
                Originally posted by ImStillHere View Post
                No plaster? Then why was he suspended and guys like Peterson aren't?

                Ever heard of Occam's Razor? The simplest answer with the least assumptions is usually the truth?

                Cotto has never broken down the way he did in that fight. Against Pacquiao a guy who hits harder a fights a tempo as quick or even quicker than Margs he was on his feet when it was stopped.

                The simplest answer is the truth and that is that Marg cheated.
                Name the fight where Cotto took as many punches as he did when he crumpled against Tony.

                Comment


                • #78
                  Originally posted by El Angel View Post
                  A guy who is "more man" wouldn't have to cheat. He's a better brawler than Cotto, his chin and stamina are better than Cotto's, he is not a better fighter than Cotto.
                  I don't think you want to go there pal.


                  We all know the low blow is a staple of puerto rican boxing.

                  Comment


                  • #79
                    Originally posted by The Gambler1981 View Post
                    You don't get your licence revoked for nothing~ that is the most serious penalty a boxer can get and they had a hearing on it.

                    Occum's razor in that situation is that the guy is most likely guilty, also calcium oxide doesn't just appear randomly or grow out of thin air.
                    And innocent men don't go to prison for nothing either.

                    Comment


                    • #80
                      Doug Fisher sounds like he wants to take it up ass from Margarito, why the hell is he so happy and gleeful about Margarito making good money after being caught. His voice and mood got so happy about that.

                      Comment

                      Working...
                      X
                      TOP