Comments Thread For: Sulaiman: Floyd-Canelo Winner Should Face Pacquiao

[Fetta]

Why are you trying to complicate this? I said a solid majority did NOT have JMM winning.

JMM winning: 57
JMM not winning: 87

87 > 57, by a good margin. Simple

Oh so now its a solid majority. I said majority not solid majority would that have mad everything easier for you.

IT9..or whatever your name is here is your boy admitting a majority had JMM winning oh but it isnt a soild majority.

And you wanna call me names

[lfc19titles]

"Majority of media and fans thought Pac lost"

no they never, the small 100 floyd stans posting until their hands bleed do not count as majority of fans son.

it was very close to 50-50 dude

everyone expected pac to murder marquez, so people for whatever reason gave rounds pac never controlled to marquez

[Fetta]

"Majority of media and fans thought Pac lost"

no they never, the small 100 floyd stans posting until their hands bleed do not count as majority of fans son.

it was very close to 50-50 dude

everyone expected pac to murder marquez, so people for whatever reason gave rounds pac never controlled to marquez

It was shown in your boys numbers that a majority thought he lost it was voted robbery of the year but like i said its not a SOLID MAJORITYas warranted by hero so ill let you spin it with hero him/her

Oh i forgot the facebook numbers that came out the next week where the fans voted and it was like 70% thought Pac lost. After the fight there were tweets from boxers and trainers who flooded the net with tweets that Pac lost but i guess they must all be Floyd fans cause thats the only explanation you can give

[rasdun]

Yes the eye test. So tell me about JMM v Pac 3 where a majority of fans and media thopught Pac lost and it was voted robbery of the year. On this ill wait for the agenda fitting spin cause that would mean he lost 2 out of last 3 and still wouldnt put him in line for a shot at the lineal championship.

Now before you get into the whole his name is money and this is the most money he can make let me tell you i dont care about other peoples money if i dont see any of it so i want to know what makes Pac legit for this shot. Beating Rios who is a lower ranked 140 fighter coming off a loss just doesnt fit that bill so dont even try

Pac v JMM was a close fight that could've went either way. I personally had it a draw. I agree more people thought Pac lost but there were media and ringside observers that thought he won. No one out side of the 2 bling judges thought Pac lost to Bradley. Even Mayweather Sr. who never said a kind word about pac in his life ackowldged this. one's a close fight that could've went either way and one was a robbery.

Rios is a tough opponent, and I actually think it's a 50/50 fight. Rios has a lot of power and it's a risk taking a fight with a power puncher coming off his recent knockout.

as I said in a post above, Pac's career accomplishments, current rating as a top 3 welterwt, and marketability would still make the fight a no-brainer if politics weren't involved. instead of saying he doesn't deserve it, tell me who does?
Broner maybe - not happening. winner of Matthyse-garcia would be good. BUt Pac definitely deserves it more than Khan - who had 2 losses, then beat a nobody and barely sc****d by a past his prime former lightwt champ

[The Big Dunn]

Why are you trying to complicate this? I said a solid majority did NOT have JMM winning.

JMM winning: 57
JMM not winning: 87

87 > 57, by a good margin. Simple

You said a solid majority did NOT have JMM winning.

Manny winning: 51
Manny not winning: 93

93 out of 144=65%
51 out of 144=35%

SO 65% had manny NOT winning, which means an even greater percentage had Manny NOT winning..

Now how about you just cut the bull**** statistical manipulation out, be an adult, and admit that the majority of people thought JMM won the 2nd and 3rd fights.

[-EAGLE-]

they should fight.

[rasdun]

Needles, not the commission, let the commission do its job, weakness, etc.. Come on kid these are called excuses. The 7 day cut off thing was a joke that none of his team can agree to and always contradicted eachother. But i forgot you must protect. Let me hear your spin

there were obviously excuses on both sides - no doubt. do u forget Floyd's - Im on vacation, I need bigger purse split, he must avenge his defeats, he must join my promotional co.... a ton of excuses on both sides.

[Zeus Molecules]

lol Fetta is being exposed time and time again, he is making up stuff as he goes along

if floyd wins this, he will never fight pac, because floyd will be floyd, look through his career, from 135, he avoided mosley because he knew he would have lost

then there ws kostya at 140, floyd ducked the best and picked on someone easier

at 147, when the division was at its best, you had the undefeated cotto, you have the beast that was margarito and you have the avoided williams, what did floyd do? cement his legacy to prove he is the best

no, he got caught on video saying he does not need to fight the best and retired to duck them, when they lost, he came back and started cherry picking a lightweight, then he cherry picked a mosley that was coming off a new 2 year lay off and still almost got k0d by him. after that, well just look, he ducked pac like the plague, making excuses after excuse and then picked vs fights like ortiz and guerrero who everyone knows were not even top 5 of the best wws

before anyone comes back with the ring or alph ratings, don't be ******, they are bought by promoters and are influences by bodies wanting to make money

and lol at pac robbing marquez, he won the damn first fight, a judging error robbed him, in the third, it was 50-50 pretty much, the unofficial scoring will pretty much show you that

I love how these floyd stans who have been exposed at hypocrites after the whole cw bs like floyd has too (mr I fight fighters at their best weight ha) are still making every excuse in the world for this fight to not happen, they are so afraid of pacman

Hey boxing fan. So what does Joan Guzman, Ali Funeka, and Zahir Raheem mean to Pac's legacy? I'll wait........

[HeroBando]

Oh so now its a solid majority. I said majority not solid majority would that have mad everything easier for you.

IT9..or whatever your name is here is your boy admitting a majority had JMM winning oh but it isnt a soild majority.

And you wanna call me names

So clueless. Dude it's not hard to follow:

1. the press row majority did NOT have JMM winning
2. Even better for me, it was a solid majority

Really nothing for you to salvage here, just remember it for next time. Cause I'll call you out a little harder if the lesson didn't take

[rasdun]

I believe a clean athlete needs no cut off but since its Pac protect away. Keep on spinning son. How long after everything went to crap did they finally agree to 7 day? Yeah right Floyd moved the goal post. You boys try to believe one thing and all of the sudden its the truth and everything after that is Floyd moving goal posts when it was a simple thing that no athlete should reject and fight would be made. Oh but the conspiracy "Pac will agree and Floyd will move posts". I go on facts not made up things that Pac fans want to beleive and fact is Pac said NO. Him and his team.

I just realized i got caught up in this same argument. Pac said NO and kept fight from happening deal with it or make up other things to believe

Its a known fact that Pac agreed to no cut-offs a couple of yrs ago. by then Floyd changed his reasons to the purse split - that's when the infamous phone call occurred when May offered a flat $0 mil for a $300 mil fight, and claimed Pac turned it down like that was a legit offer, offering and approx. 80/20 split