Tweet
So I ask this question in post 6:
A reasonable question that needs answering before you seriously can try to determine whether Vitali is an ATG or not.
Oddly enough the TS, who is a mod of boxingscene's historysection BTW, ignores the question and spends the next several days laughing and ridiculing the posters who voted Vitali was an ATG. Finally 170 posts later we get the definition that is paramount:
In other words you have to be considered top 20 in your division all-time to be considered an ATG.
Now Jab and his henchmen has spent about 100+ posts ridiculing those saying Vitali was an ATG, so one would think that Jab, being a scholar of the sports history, has Vitali ranked far away from all-time greatness. I mean how else can you justify all that bullying and ridiculing?
Let's see the answer:
So Vitali JUST misses the cut! Ahahahahaha!
What a joke you are Jab. How can you justify this ridicule towards posters who just might happen to rank Vitali no. 20 all-time instead instead of JUST missing the cut as you do? We are talking about highly subjective all-time rankings where the difference might be as low as one single place! Talk about having an agenda!
Wauw!
A reasonable question that needs answering before you seriously can try to determine whether Vitali is an ATG or not.
Oddly enough the TS, who is a mod of boxingscene's historysection BTW, ignores the question and spends the next several days laughing and ridiculing the posters who voted Vitali was an ATG. Finally 170 posts later we get the definition that is paramount:
In other words you have to be considered top 20 in your division all-time to be considered an ATG.
Now Jab and his henchmen has spent about 100+ posts ridiculing those saying Vitali was an ATG, so one would think that Jab, being a scholar of the sports history, has Vitali ranked far away from all-time greatness. I mean how else can you justify all that bullying and ridiculing?
Let's see the answer:
So Vitali JUST misses the cut! Ahahahahaha!
What a joke you are Jab. How can you justify this ridicule towards posters who just might happen to rank Vitali no. 20 all-time instead instead of JUST missing the cut as you do? We are talking about highly subjective all-time rankings where the difference might be as low as one single place! Talk about having an agenda!
Wauw!
I got destroyed? Not a single person including yourself has been able to explain how Vittles can be an ATG with his weak resume. Nuthuggers like to say he can beat this one or that one so he's an ATG. Sorry son but that's not how it works. Name me one all time great without a win over a HOF fighter. You can't. But we should make an exception for ole Vitaly because you're sweet on him. So you go ahead and keep talking out your ass about how I "got destroyed". But just remember, more than 3/4 of the voters agree with me. Did they all get destroyed too? Do they all have an agenda?
Comment