Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Comments Thread For: Calzaghe Furious With Froch: Verbally BlastsThe Cobra

Collapse
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • #51
    Originally posted by Keitha313 View Post
    He got knocked down by old man B-hop and fought life and death with Bernard, a so called legend who was in his prime (Joe) fighting a guy well in his 40's it should of been easy work but that wasn't the case!!
    Joe Calzaghe fighting a 40year old B-hop is the biggest fight of his career!!!

    You don't expect anyone to believe Joe would of beat James Toney, Roy Jones Jr or B-hop when they were in there 30's do you?

    His big career move to America is when he was in his late 30's!!!
    Froch moved and fought over in America the first chance he was given.
    Youve just said it...joe was in his Late 30s and past his own prime when he fought in the USA ...just saying

    Comment


    • #52
      Originally posted by Mrpedigree View Post
      Youve just said it...joe was in his Late 30s and past his own prime when he fought in the USA ...just saying
      fighting a 44year old Bernard Hopkins then followed by a 40 year old Roy Jones jr...
      Where was Calzaghe 10years ago from then?
      Nothing excuses his cowardice of him not wanting to fight the best, he's actually a better cherry picker than Sven Ottke!
      Path your record with past it fighters to make it look better than it actually is but the fact is alot of people know, having a 0 without fighting the top guys in your prime makes you an unaccomplished fighter who never lived up to your full potential or even gave yourself the proper test.

      It's like claiming to be the best footballer in the world yet you've only ever played in the 2nd division and never competed at the elite level due to the fear of potentially being exposed for a fraud.

      Comment


      • #53
        Calzaghe fought a prime Kessler and won. He fought a 44 year old Hopkin's by moving up to LHW and won.

        Froch lost to Kessler and won't fight Hopkin's at LHW.

        Froch is clearly not as good.

        Calzaghe would beat a SMW not MW Abraham
        A shot Road Warrior
        A fairly shot Taylor at SMW
        A Green ass Mentally weak Dirrell
        Bute has no chin
        Pascal has no stamina

        Ward may have beaten CaLZAGHE

        Comment


        • #54
          Originally posted by Master Chief View Post
          Calzaghe fought a prime Kessler and won. He fought a 44 year old Hopkin's by moving up to LHW and won.

          Froch lost to Kessler and won't fight Hopkin's at LHW.

          Froch is clearly not as good.

          Calzaghe would beat a SMW not MW Abraham
          A shot Road Warrior
          A fairly shot Taylor at SMW
          A Green ass Mentally weak Dirrell
          Bute has no chin
          Pascal has no stamina

          Ward may have beaten CaLZAGHE
          My god my head hurts from reading that crap...
          Ward WOULD school Calzaghe no Ifs or buts about it, he barely beat a 44year old Bernard Hopkins and in alot of peoples minds Calzaghe never won that fight.

          Comment


          • #55
            Calslappy should STFU, he dodged and ducked Froch back in the day. He is just a bitter old man now.

            Comment


            • #56
              in a head to head match up Froch would probably lose to Jokezaghe, but Froch's resume bi.tchslaps Jokezaghe's resume any day of the week

              Comment


              • #57
                Originally posted by Keitha313 View Post
                fighting a 44year old Bernard Hopkins then followed by a 40 year old Roy Jones jr...
                Where was Calzaghe 10years ago from then?
                Nothing excuses his cowardice of him not wanting to fight the best, he's actually a better cherry picker than Sven Ottke!
                Path your record with past it fighters to make it look better than it actually is but the fact is alot of people know, having a 0 without fighting the top guys in your prime makes you an unaccomplished fighter who never lived up to your full potential or even gave yourself the proper test.

                It's like claiming to be the best footballer in the world yet you've only ever played in the 2nd division and never competed at the elite level due to the fear of potentially being exposed for a fraud.

                What does Hopkins' age matter? He is 48 now and still schooling younger fighters. He's still a top LHW 5 years after Calzaghe beat him.

                It's a shame Hopkins turned down the Calzaghe fight when they were both closer to their primes.

                Comment


                • #58
                  Originally posted by Wenger Is God View Post
                  What does Hopkins' age matter? He is 48 now and still schooling younger fighters. He's still a top LHW 5 years after Calzaghe beat him.

                  It's a shame Hopkins turned down the Calzaghe fight when they were both closer to their primes.
                  The point is the hype around Calzaghes name is not justified.

                  Comment


                  • #59
                    Originally posted by Mrpedigree View Post
                    Youve just said it...joe was in his Late 30s and past his own prime when he fought in the USA ...just saying
                    36 is late 30's? why didn't he come to the USA earlier? oh yeah he was scared of flying! lol!

                    Comment


                    • #60
                      Calzaghe had the better talent but didn't really prove himself. Froch has the better resume and will go down as the great fighter no doubt.

                      Comment

                      Working...
                      X
                      TOP