which is the more impressive feat:by Pacquiao or Mayweather jr?

[Marvellous1]

What a terrible question. It's like asking, "What's better? Muhammed Ali beating George Forman or Lennox Lewis beating Frank Bruno?". It's a loaded question that is sure to spark ****** arguments not intelligent debate.

The true definition of trolling.

[Marvellous1]

Oh and by the way, the answer is a obvious. Pacquiao's achievement is the greater of the two. It's like asking who's victories over Mosley and DLH has move value. Not even a debate is it?

[tyotfo]

I'd rather have Pacquious resume than Floyds. No one ever says Pacquiou ducked anyone.

[Jam Jars]

Primes? LOL Morales lost his previous fight before the Pacquiao defeat and it's debatable that he beat JMM 1 time.

[jayblack]

i bet you are a pac fan now, now that hes outta his prime, you easily can say that now that nobody cares about that pac vs floyd fight, floyd fans are ****in weasels just like you

Most Pac fans are not boxing fans. They simply follow pac and hate on anyone who posses a threat to him, or who speaks their opinion against Pac. You all typically fail to have any substancial logic or fact to back your close minded arguments. Fact is Pac has a great exciting style. However lets not act as though he was not spoon fed a lot of his opponents. And lets definitly not act as though Morales or Barrera were even close to their primes when they fought. Especially not the 2nd time he fought Barrera. The first time he and Barerra fought is debatable. He went life and death with Marquez 3x which many believe Marquez won the first 3 fights, then he got planked by Marquez in the 4th fight. Mayweather beat an undefeated Corrales who was a complete monster at 130, and then beat an undefeated Hatton who was on the top 10 P4P list.
Granted Morrales, Barrera, and Marquez are all first ballot HOF, but at the time that Pac fought them were they fighting at a level where you would still consider them to be great? I would say yes to Marquez, but I don't belive Barrera nor Morrales were fighting at a level that any of us would consider to be great.

[SpeedKillz]

in this particular scenario, pac is more impressive and i dont think its even close based on the guidelines you laid out.

for the record, im a mayweather fan, but this seems kinda like entrapment lol

obviously pac beating those 3 legends is more impressive than floyd beating diego and hatton...

[jayblack]

I'd rather have Pacquious resume than Floyds. No one ever says Pacquiou ducked anyone.

So you would rather have 5 losses with 3 by KO and 2 draws on your record rather than be 44 - 0? And I think it depends on who you're asking if you call it a duck or not. Many fighters believe Pac ducked the Mayweather fight. He turned down a 50/50 split because he did not want to participate in random drug testing that bith fighters were subject to. And then he turned down 40mil which would have clearly been his highest payday ever to fight Bradley for half of that.

[JD Salinger]

lol @ hatton and corrales being anywhere near the level of the mexicans.

^^^ this...

[dc3383]

which is the more impressive feat

Pacquaio defeating the 3 mexican legends(Barrera,Morales,Marquez)twice each in their primes.

OR
Mayweather jr ending the undefeated streaks of Corrales(35-0)and Hatton(43-0) both in convincing victories

which is more impressive?

Barrera nor Morales was in there prime

[arizashakes]

Pac beating the legend Barrera twice is better than any win in Floyd's career. Don't forget he beat the legend Marquez twice and drew with him once (should have won). And you can say Morales weren't at his best but he still beat him when he was a legitimate threat.

Those 3 are 3 legends of the lower weight classes and of Mexican boxing. People tend to forget that Pac beat them because they remember his exploits around 147 more, but beating those three fighters alone is better than Floyd's resume so if you add in his exploits around 147 it's evident who should be higher in the all time P4P list.