which is the more impressive feat:by Pacquiao or Mayweather jr?

[Jam Jars]

Hatton fight took place at 147, he was a good lighter welter but a decent welter at best, in fact, I would say he was lucky to be undefeated as he was hurt bad in his previous fight and the ref helped him out with the shoe lace thing

ricky hatton was never that good, just look at the dudes resume, he was a decent/good boxer at best imo, would lose to a lot of 140s even his prime in todays world

corales was good but thats it

for sure pac, there really is no contest

Hatton weighed more than Mayweather on fight night, the weight was no advantage. He was struggling to make 140 which is why he tried his hand at 147 previously vs Collazo. The Lazcano (shoelace fight) was after Mayweather at 140. Look at the weigh in pics for the Pacquiao fight Hatton looked half dead. Hatton was a very good fighter that outgrew his division but was too small to compete with the big guys at 147.

[Jam Jars]

I love how 'majority' is 6 people.
http://boxrec.com/media/index.php/Ma...3rd_meeting%29

57 for Marquez, 51 for Pacquaio, 38 draw

If that isn't the definition of a close fight, then what is? Ricky Hatton was also fought at an unnatural weight, where as Pacquaio faced him in his best division... stop nitpicking. Pacquaio has beat Marquez twice, and would've been a 3rd if the judge in the 1st wasn't ****** and made a mistake. Let me guess, you think Marquez won all 4 fights and they weren't even close for Pacquaio? This isn't Bradley, you can't call there fights robberies when they are so even.

Barrera, Marquez >>> Hatton, Corrales... that's not even including Morales... inb4 hurr durr barrera and Marquez weren't in prime... cause that's B/S.

How can you call them wins if they were so close?

[New England]

this is a reverse larry thread...

he would add a "this man"

[Jam Jars]

Lol u bring up weight drained.....did u not see Morales when Pac beat him....he looked like a skeleton

[IMG]http://img.***********.com/albums/v223/ICE888/Pacquiao%20Pics/Moralesyatot.jpg[/IMG]

Failed to make weight and lost his previous fight but Pacquiao insisted he drained down for their fight.

[The Big Dunn]

I love how 'majority' is 6 people.
http://boxrec.com/media/index.php/Ma...3rd_meeting%29

57 for Marquez, 51 for Pacquaio, 38 draw

If that isn't the definition of a close fight, then what is? Ricky Hatton was also fought at an unnatural weight, where as Pacquaio faced him in his best division... stop nitpicking. Pacquaio has beat Marquez twice, and would've been a 3rd if the judge in the 1st wasn't ****** and made a mistake. Let me guess, you think Marquez won all 4 fights and they weren't even close for Pacquaio? This isn't Bradley, you can't call there fights robberies when they are so even.

Barrera, Marquez >>> Hatton, Corrales... that's not even including Morales... inb4 hurr durr barrera and Marquez weren't in prime... cause that's B/S.

I answered the question. The numbers you posted show I was correct- the majority thought JMM won. I thought Manny won.

You are pickng at my answer but everything I posted was true and in context. Beating Morales can't be that great if Rahim beat him before manny did and manny had already fought Morales and LOST!

Barrera was great win. when he drew with JMM, jmm hadn't beaten barrera yet and had lost to John.

I bet you didn't know this and just answered Manny without any analysis or thought.

[The Big Dunn]

are you sure abt. this? oh boy, you've gotta be biased when you said that. barrera, morales, marquez? over corrales & hatton?

ARe you going atrictly by name or where they were in their career when the fights happened?

The bias person answers manny without any thought or analysis. Manny lost to morales 1st and zahir raheem beat him the fight before Manny did.

If we go just by names then bareera, jmm, and Morales have more name value all time than hatton and corrales. But I can't imagine anyone, even the biggest manny fan, arguing Morales stature after losing to zahir raheem. That and not clearly beating JMM means the question is is beating Barerra twice when he did better than beating corales and hatton?

I answered that.

[PulpFriction]

that guy says alotta things, he once told me floyd mayweathercan make a rabbit come outta his azz , lol, im kidding but if he had to, lol, i bet he would say that in floyds defense:*******:

Everytime i read your dumb posts i feel like i'm reading something written by a 16 yr old girl with your ****** "lol" all over the place

[PulpFriction]

Manny by a landslide. Those fights for Floyd were still carefully selected and he was a big favorite. Pacquiao was not the favorite over Barrera who just beat Hamed.

Barrera fought pac 2.5 years after he beat hamed

[Jam Jars]

Barrera fought pac 2.5 years after he beat hamed

SSSHHHhhh they don't like the truth.

[sargo]

The three Mexicans are all-time greats. Pacquiao destroyed Hatton. Barrera and JMM became champions again after losing to Pacquiao.