Originally posted by bravestone
View Post
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
Alvarez Now A Tougher Fight Than the 2006 De La Hoya?
Collapse
-
-
Originally posted by puga View Posti'd rate canelo above but not that much higher... tbh , canelo does'nt have the style , the abilty, the stamina , the workrate to beat floyd imo....i give him a puncher's chance but im pretty sure floyd will duck him for some reason....
id still rate the oscar win higher just because its Delahoya, canelo would be a nice win too though
Comment
-
-
Originally posted by bravestone View Postwhich is the bigger test and better win for Mayweather jr?
DLH was coming off Mayorga, looking great, at a good weight, and this was Mayweather's first fight at 154
Alvarez is younger, stronger, with good skills and Mayweather has gotten older and looked vulnerable at 154 his last fight.
Which will be tougher/the better win?
the DLH that Cherrypicker fought would've had a rough time against the ginger, that version of DLH was just fighting for money, he didn't have the hunger anyone
Comment
-
Floyd wouldn't even fight Trout to begin with. So i don't know why he says Canelo is not proven. Or are ya'll gonna say Guerrero was more experienced and more dangerous than Trout? I'll put all my money that Floyd would NEVER fight Trout. Canelo whooped Trout easy.
Comment
-
Originally posted by DempseyRollin View Posti find it hilarious that ppl actually feel canelo dominated trout.
As for the topic, I'll say the truth is somewhere in the middle. That Oscar and this Canelo to me are probably roughly even. At this point Canelo is probably not gonna be the very best he could possibly be at 22 years old and Oscar was a part time boxer by that point. My only worry with Canelo is that he is gonna be one of those peak early types. Hard to imgine how far up he goes from here, but if he continues going up damn would that be good for the sport.
Both rank fairly meh for me on Floyd's career list, but beating the Golden Boy scores more points for me if I had to choose.Last edited by Biolink; 05-11-2013, 02:13 AM.
Comment
-
Originally posted by Biolink View PostNSB as usual. You know how it is.
As for the topic, I'll say the truth is somewhere in the middle. That Oscar and this Canelo to me are probably roughly even. At this point Canelo is probably not gonna be the very best he could possibly be at 22 years old and Oscar was a part time boxer by that point. My only worry with Canelo is that he is gonna be one of those peak early types. Hard to imgine how far up he goes from here, but if he continues going up damn would that be good for the sport.
Both rank fairly meh for me on Floyd's career list, but beating the Golden Boy scores more points for me if I had to choose.
Comment
-
I win over Canelo would be more impressive than a win over Oscar. The reason being is that Floyd is approaching the twilight of his career and Alvarez is much younger, focused and determined with everything to prove as opposed to De La Hoya who had been semi-retired by the time he challenged Floyd with nothing to prove. Moreover by 2007; The Golden Boy was emotionally drained and was not fully as committed, dedicated or motivated to the sport as he had been in previous years. By that time he fought Mayweather, he was a part-time fighter at best, busy building his promotional company (Golden Boy Promotions) while tending to other business ventures as well.
Comment
Comment