Are people kidding me? Oscar in 2006 at 154 is clearly better then Canelo. I'm sure Oscar would have easily ran through trout without any trouble. People forget that Trout is on the come up just like Canelo.
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
Alvarez Now A Tougher Fight Than the 2006 De La Hoya?
Collapse
-
Originally posted by bravestone View Postwhich is the bigger test and better win for Mayweather jr?
DLH was coming off Mayorga, looking great, at a good weight, and this was Mayweather's first fight at 154
Alvarez is younger, stronger, with good skills and Mayweather has gotten older and looked vulnerable at 154 his last fight.
Which will be tougher/the better win?
DLH is a one handed fighter. Canelo is a two handed fighter. After DLH fought MAyweather he fought Forbes and didn't look very good at all. Mayorga was not on the level of De la Hoya he couldn't get away from a jab.
Comment
-
Originally posted by Zano-24 View PostAre people kidding me? Oscar in 2006 at 154 is clearly better then Canelo. I'm sure Oscar would have easily ran through trout without any trouble. People forget that Trout is on the come up just like Canelo.
Comment
-
Originally posted by ILLuminato View PostI can't believe some of the replies to this. Canelo dominated Trout, he doesn't look silly when "taking punches" even though he didn't take many during the Trout fight.
DLH is a one handed fighter. Canelo is a two handed fighter. After DLH fought MAyweather he fought Forbes and didn't look very good at all. Mayorga was not on the level of De la Hoya he couldn't get away from a jab.
Comment
-
Originally posted by ILLuminato View PostTrout beat Miguel Cotto, who lost to a similar margin that Oscar did against Mayweather. I think Trout would have a chance against DLH to win.
Comment
-
Originally posted by Zano-24 View PostHuh? Trout doesn't have the skills to beat Oscar of 2006. Trout only beat Cotto because he was able to use his size advantage and his boxing skills combined. Also Cotto couldn't hurt Trout which played a big role. According to Trout his size played a part in his win vs Cotto and I'm glad that he was at least honest about it. Oscar in 2006 would run through Cotto, Trout and Canelo at 154.
Originally posted by bravestone View PostI don't think Canelo dominated Trout at at all.
Comment
-
Originally posted by Zano-24 View PostHuh? Trout doesn't have the skills to beat Oscar of 2006. Trout only beat Cotto because he was able to use his size advantage and his boxing skills combined. Also Cotto couldn't hurt Trout which played a big role. According to Trout his size played a part in his win vs Cotto and I'm glad that he was at least honest about it. Oscar in 2006 would run through Cotto, Trout and Canelo at 154.
Comment
-
Comment