Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

The Floyd Mayweather Jr. master discussion thread. Post here, do not make new threads

Collapse
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • #51
    Originally posted by ROSS CALIFORNIA View Post
    Once his speed and reflexes go, he's not going to be the same.
    true
    shame theyve only lasted him 17yrs
    poor guy

    Comment


    • #52
      Originally posted by Big Dunn View Post
      Of course you knew floyd could fight at 154 in 2007.

      Thats whats so sad-that appears to be the only thing you learned.

      Can floyd defend the title against Josesito Lopez? He fought at 154 too.
      Nope, just pointing out glaring facts. Floyd can fight at 154, has twice. Doesn't seem to want to make the most money fighting the biggest draw (behind him of course), for whatever reason. My post involves Floyd/Canelo. It's sad to see you using Lopez to defend Floyd, no shame.

      Comment


      • #53
        60%........

        Comment


        • #54
          I doubt that Mayweather - Alvarez will ever happen. Floyd is a cherry picker and with Alvarez he sees a real threat. He'd rather fight Pacman then Canelo.
          He had an option to sign contract when Alvarez was ready to fight on his undercard and he declined. Floyd the cherry picker is good at cherry picking.

          By the way, in my book, Floyd record in not impeccable. Without a doubt,he lost his first encounter with Castillo. He received a present from the judges. Folks have a tendency to forget about that.

          Would Floyd fight Austin Trout? I doubt it as well.

          Comment


          • #55
            If Floyd does fight in September it is going to be against Danny Garcia.

            Comment


            • #56
              Originally posted by Bushbaby View Post
              Nope, just pointing out glaring facts. Floyd can fight at 154, has twice. Doesn't seem to want to make the most money fighting the biggest draw (behind him of course), for whatever reason. My post involves Floyd/Canelo. It's sad to see you using Lopez to defend Floyd, no shame.
              Thats false......

              Comment


              • #57
                Originally posted by Bushbaby View Post
                Nope, just pointing out glaring facts. Floyd can fight at 154, has twice. Doesn't seem to want to make the most money fighting the biggest draw (behind him of course), for whatever reason. My post involves Floyd/Canelo. It's sad to see you using Lopez to defend Floyd, no shame.
                I asked a question based on the things you've posted. You wouldn't answer it and flipped it to a defense of floyd because you know the logic your using-fought at 154 twice- isn't relevant at this stage because the fight isn't signed.

                You are also avoiding the point I made in the initial post-that your complaining for no good reason just like you did with Canelo/Trout.

                You're talking about Canelo/Floyd. I'm asking about your logic used when talking about canelo/floyd. The only pathetic thing is that you can't justify it so you use the ole "defense of floyd" label to avoid making yourself look as bad as you have this past year plus.

                Comment


                • #58
                  Originally posted by Big Dunn View Post
                  I asked a question based on the things you've posted. You wouldn't answer it and flipped it to a defense of floyd because you know the logic your using-fought at 154 twice- isn't relevant at this stage because the fight isn't signed.

                  You are also avoiding the point I made in the initial post-that your complaining for no good reason just like you did with Canelo/Trout.

                  You're talking about Canelo/Floyd. I'm asking about your logic used when talking about canelo/floyd. The only pathetic thing is that you can't justify it so you use the ole "defense of floyd" label to avoid making yourself look as bad as you have this past year plus.
                  There was no reason to complain before Canelo Trout happened then?? I know amnesia is a hereditary trait on bs, especially with Floyd fans though. There was a lot going down before Canelo/Trout.

                  If I was wrong about that so were Floyd fans. Don't act like you forgot Canelo wanted a guarantee to fight Floyd before that fight. Don't do that. And if we've learned anything recently it seems like he was right to do so.

                  When you live in a glass house don't throw stones bro. Doesn't change your level of pathetic-ness either. You did use Josesito Lopez as a Floyd defense. That's as lame as it gets. I didn't ask you to quote me, get off subject and talk about a very relevant concern while forgetting half of the equation cause it didn't suite your weak argument.

                  Comment


                  • #59
                    LOL I find it ***in cute how this thread is supposed to be for Flowmoes or the actual Floyd Mayweather fans yet instead, it's full of his haters who constantly dickride him and can't take his **** out of their mouths LOL

                    Comment


                    • #60
                      Originally posted by Bushbaby View Post
                      There was no reason to complain before Canelo Trout happened then?? I know amnesia is a hereditary trait on bs, especially with Floyd fans though. There was a lot going down before Canelo/Trout.

                      If I was wrong about that so were Floyd fans. Don't act like you forgot Canelo wanted a guarantee to fight Floyd before that fight. Don't do that. And if we've learned anything recently it seems like he was right to do so.

                      When you live in a glass house don't throw stones bro. Doesn't change your level of pathetic-ness either. You did use Josesito Lopez as a Floyd defense. That's as lame as it gets. I didn't ask you to quote me, get off subject and talk about a very relevant concern while forgetting half of the equation cause it didn't suite your weak argument.
                      what does any of this have to do with your year of posts about canelo will not fight trout and you being wrong? there was nothing to ***** about.

                      if canelo did or didn't want a guarantee again-it has nothing to do with you being wrong about them not fighting and it has nothing to do with me suggesting to you that maybe this time around posting incessantly about what wont happen is not something a respectable poster would do.

                      I asked you about Lopez because he fought at 154. But you couldn't or wouldn't answer because the thought of Lopez being a 154 lber based on his one fight there as an undersized foe is the same ****** logic you are using. We agree floyd can and should fight canelo at 154. I'm just questioning your logic.

                      Comment

                      Working...
                      X
                      TOP