Well I watched some of the Murray-Sturm bout just to gauge this guy. He looked strong, resilient, had a good tight guard, but essentially I was convinced Martinez would do to him what he's done to guys like Macklin, b/c he's just that good. So yes I was surprised, I felt like I underestimated Murray after the fight. Many of us did.
I have factored in Martinez's age and recurring injuries, but a simple eye test against the middleweight champ should show you Murray is a solid fighter.
I wouldn't call either a joke fight, that's just not true. Broner-Rees fits the description of a joke fight much better. I agree they did better than they were expected to, not to say Provodnikov (had I not said he was going to give a good account of himself versus Bradley) or Murray are bad fighters. Look at khan-garcia, people were saying who had Garcia beat other than a shot Holt and shot Morales? But he went and made a name for himself and proved many nonbelievers wrong.
------
It's a matter of opinion from here on out obviously. My opinion of Provodnikov is a bit more biased since I actually went on record as saying he'll give Bradley a good fight, but guys like Provod and Murray can do the same as Garcia and prove that they are indeed solid fighters to those that are still unconvinced.
Also wanted to add, a lot of guys hear a European fighters name and automatically think, 'well I haven't heard of him, must be a bum.' It's never that simple. I think too many are selling Murray short. I'm sure Sergio didn't think it was going to be a hard fight, but how many fighters do? Again, nothing wrong with pointing out some possible excuses (I did it) but no reason to sell the other guy completely short. I'll be on the look out for Murray, see if he can follow it up before I write it off as a fluke performance.
I have factored in Martinez's age and recurring injuries, but a simple eye test against the middleweight champ should show you Murray is a solid fighter.
I wouldn't call either a joke fight, that's just not true. Broner-Rees fits the description of a joke fight much better. I agree they did better than they were expected to, not to say Provodnikov (had I not said he was going to give a good account of himself versus Bradley) or Murray are bad fighters. Look at khan-garcia, people were saying who had Garcia beat other than a shot Holt and shot Morales? But he went and made a name for himself and proved many nonbelievers wrong.
------
It's a matter of opinion from here on out obviously. My opinion of Provodnikov is a bit more biased since I actually went on record as saying he'll give Bradley a good fight, but guys like Provod and Murray can do the same as Garcia and prove that they are indeed solid fighters to those that are still unconvinced.
Also wanted to add, a lot of guys hear a European fighters name and automatically think, 'well I haven't heard of him, must be a bum.' It's never that simple. I think too many are selling Murray short. I'm sure Sergio didn't think it was going to be a hard fight, but how many fighters do? Again, nothing wrong with pointing out some possible excuses (I did it) but no reason to sell the other guy completely short. I'll be on the look out for Murray, see if he can follow it up before I write it off as a fluke performance.
Comment