Marquez should support his Mexican little brother.
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
Comments Thread For: Marquez: Trout Win Does Not Make Canelo an Elite Boxer
Collapse
-
Marquez is bitter than Alvarez is in his early 20's and has reached rock star status in Mexico.
JMM on the other hand is only popular due to his name being associated with Manny Pacquiao. It's his own fault as he should have taken the Morales, Hamed, Barrera (actually fight happened way too late) and other fights when he had a chance vs pricing himself out and fighting bums.
Comment
-
Trout is the real deal. I can't name anyone at 154 that I would favor over him.
He easily beats Lara, Angulo etc.
4-20 we saw the #1 vs #2 fighters in that division square off, yet clowns like JMM still want to complain.
Comment
-
Funny - I just went through the last 12 pages and those people who are against what Marquez said can't come up with any better refuting argument other then 'he mad, he jelly, he old'. I have yet to see an objective argument on why Marquez is wrong.
Also, I think open scoring is bogus.
Comment
-
Originally posted by anonymous2.0 View PostFunny - I just went through the last 12 pages and those people who are against what Marquez said can't come up with any better refuting argument other then 'he mad, he jelly, he old'. I have yet to see an objective argument on why Marquez is wrong.
Also, I think open scoring is bogus.
I'd love for someone to tell me how his performance against trout, who he was predicted to beat, makes him "elite". I think people are confusing elite and good.
Comment
-
Originally posted by Grimgash View PostMarquez isn't wrong. Trout got a lot of hype for beating Cotto, who isn't a great 154 lber. That's really all he had. Canelo had a lot of hype for beating....okay for being Canelo. Neither looked exactly impressive, and it was a really close fight. Canelo looked very unconditioned. I consider it a good win, but he's nowhere near elite at this point. Didn't look like a p4p fighter, but did look like a good 154 lber fighter.
I'd love for someone to tell me how his performance against trout, who he was predicted to beat, makes him "elite". I think people are confusing elite and good.Last edited by Toltec77; 04-22-2013, 05:16 PM.
Comment
-
Originally posted by Grimgash View PostMarquez isn't wrong. Trout got a lot of hype for beating Cotto, who isn't a great 154 lber. That's really all he had. Canelo had a lot of hype for beating....okay for being Canelo. Neither looked exactly impressive, and it was a really close fight. Canelo looked very unconditioned. I consider it a good win, but he's nowhere near elite at this point. Didn't look like a p4p fighter, but did look like a good 154 lber fighter.
I'd love for someone to tell me how his performance against trout, who he was predicted to beat, makes him "elite". I think people are confusing elite and good.
I just think open scoring will allow a fighter to fight 7/12 or 6/10 rounds rather then the full 12 or 10.
Comment
-
Originally posted by Toltec77 View PostYah like you could do any better, bet your ads never step in a boxing ring, to hate the boy is only 22 years old and already out performing most at this point in his career.
Beating a guy who's claim to fame is only beating Cotto, who you were supposed to beat (I said Canelo would win as did most journalists) and not looking impressive doing it, as your signature win.... doesn't make you an elite fighter.... it's that simple. If you feel like replying again, at least talking boxing... it's not hard.
Comment
Comment