Comments Thread For: HBO's Lederman: Canelo is Going To Destroy Trout!

Collapse
Collapse
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • Hougigo
    Gossip Girl
    Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
    • Sep 2011
    • 38755
    • 730
    • 236
    • 47,223

    #21

    Comment

    • Biolink
      Donaire is #1
      Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
      • Feb 2006
      • 9927
      • 642
      • 2,209
      • 40,170

      #22
      Originally posted by Bushbaby
      Wow, imagine if everyone who cherrypicked bums, lightweight and journeymen while campaigning at least 1 weight class above everyone he's ever faced got these undeserved accolades. The sport would be really screwed.
      Seriously.

      Canelo is a talented boxer, and has IQ beyond his years, but they need to slow down with crowning this kid a superstar and everything. GBP has done a hell of a job hyping him up.

      Comment

      • Pain~Lucy
        God of War
        Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
        • Nov 2012
        • 4493
        • 338
        • 147
        • 15,937

        #23
        Originally posted by SoggyLungs
        yah seriously lol....just shows how well GBP has hyped up canelo. i don't see canelo destroying trout because 1)trout isn't undersized 2)he isn't past his prime and 3)trout has good boxing ability ...
        and 4)he's under Haymon?

        Comment

        • Bushbaby
          Wild Apache
          Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
          • Dec 2008
          • 23513
          • 727
          • 370
          • 32,078

          #24
          Originally posted by FeFist
          He didn't say Canelo was a proven fighter. To be honest it is people like you that makes a part of me want fighters like Trout and Lara to lose.
          No he didn't. What I addressed was how 1 can say Trout isn't proven when he's fighting canelo, who's done less in more fights. Most people want Trout to lose already, so what's you being 1 extra guy??

          I find it amazing though, that guys would want the pampered spoon fed fighter to win. While wishing the destruction of the fighter that actually had to earn his shot. Shows how severely deluded the boxing fan has become, as far as I'm concerned.

          Comment

          • The Gambler1981
            Undisputed Champion
            Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
            • May 2008
            • 25961
            • 521
            • 774
            • 49,039

            #25
            Well Lederman likes aggressive fighters who press the action and even at his measured pace that is much more Canelo than it is Trout so no surprise Lederman would say something like that.


            If he said Trout wold win that would have been much more interesting~

            Comment

            • B.U.R.N.E.R
              ~NSB Legend 2005-2015~
              Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
              • Feb 2010
              • 30197
              • 1,346
              • 400
              • 47,475

              #26
              I got Canelo stopping Trout late.

              Comment

              • Doctor_Tenma
                Monster
                Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
                • Apr 2009
                • 33313
                • 1,327
                • 1,249
                • 58,127

                #27
                Originally posted by Bushbaby
                No he didn't. What I addressed was how 1 can say Trout isn't proven when he's fighting canelo, who's done less in more fights. Most people want Trout to lose already, so what's you being 1 extra guy??

                I find it amazing though, that guys would want the pampered spoon fed fighter to win. While wishing the destruction of the fighter that actually had to earn his shot. Shows how severely deluded the boxing fan has become, as far as I'm concerned.
                Bush, you like many others contributing to painting a false false picture of the 154 pound division, the division ain't filled with killers, it hasn't had a killer since Martinez moved up, or I should say one hasn't established itself. So this notion that Canelo ain't want none is ****** man.

                Comment

                • Big_L
                  Undisputed Champion
                  Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
                  • Apr 2004
                  • 2496
                  • 72
                  • 1
                  • 11,730

                  #28
                  cotto was beating trout half way through and gassed horribly. that's why i'm not completely sold on trout. I don't think Canelo will destroy him though but could be a wide decision.

                  Comment

                  • QballLobo
                    Undisputed Champion
                    • Nov 2011
                    • 7153
                    • 1,310
                    • 112
                    • 48,002

                    #29
                    I think Canelo wins this fight, but I don't think he destroys Trout at all. I think he will UD him. Trout's a good fighter, but he is nothing special. People hyping him up here just don't like all the attention Canelo gets so they want him to lose badly.
                    Would love to see this boards reaction if Canelo ends up destroying him though, would be hilarious.

                    Comment

                    • Bushbaby
                      Wild Apache
                      Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
                      • Dec 2008
                      • 23513
                      • 727
                      • 370
                      • 32,078

                      #30
                      Originally posted by Dominicano Soy
                      Bush, you like many others contributing to painting a false false picture of the 154 pound division, the division ain't filled with killers, it hasn't had a killer since Martinez moved up, or I should say one hasn't established itself. So this notion that Canelo ain't want none is ****** man.
                      How many title fights has canelo been in and how many were jr middleweights?? Who's lucking ****** now??

                      Comment

                      Working...
                      TOP