Originally posted by Weltschmerz
View Post
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
Should David Haye get another Wlad shot?
Collapse
-
-
Originally posted by JAB5239 View PostNo more bogus than any other orgs top fighter. Like I said, if you want to live by the orgs than you have ro die by them. Helenius has one fight in over a year against and of journeyman, how is he more deserving of his position? And if he fights this summer it will be 2 fights in 2 years, about the same as Helenius. So what is the difference? You will of course try to use Helenius' injury, but the fact remains he has been inactive and he has done nothing more than Haye to retain such a lofty ranking. Why complain about one fighter who can bring tons of money to thectable, but not the other who wouldn't bring nearly as much?
And again, Wlad already beat Haye, there's no logical reason to give him another shot. If Haye comes back and beats a couple of the other top 10 contenders, then fine, but before he does that, no way he deserves another Wlad shot on his name alone.
Comment
-
Originally posted by Weltschmerz View PostHelenius is not in line for an immediate world shot, he's on a comeback road. So no, he's not deserving either at the moment, but he's not pretending to be either, as far as I'm aware.
And again, Wlad already beat Haye, there's no logical reason to give him another shot. If Haye comes back and beats a couple of the other top 10 contenders, then fine, but before he does that, no way he deserves another Wlad shot on his name alone.
Comment
-
Originally posted by JAB5239 View PostHe won't be getting a shot on his name alone. He'll get it because he is the best fighter in the WBA rankings according to them. Wlad having already beaten Haye is irrelevant if the WBA thinks he is the best defense for Wlad to make in the near future. Personalty I wish Haye would destroy Povetkin and than get the Wlad fight. Sasha doesn't deserve it without fighting a top fighter like Haye first. Jmo.
Comment
-
Originally posted by ShamrockXpress View PostI may be wrong and may be confused by all the bull5h1t abc rules, but doesn't being no.1 in the WBAs ranking make you the mandatory for the regular title and being the regular champ makes you the mandatory for the super title? So Haye at least needs to beat povetkin to be true no.1. Then again the WBA gave chagaevs title to valuev so Haye could win it, so who nos what rules they'll enforce.
Comment
-
Originally posted by JAB5239 View PostYour absolutely right. I did a little checking and Haye is mandatory to Povetkin. I'm not sure how long that will be though or when and how it will be enforced. If Povetkin fights Wlad as supposedly planned he loses his "regular" title. If he doesnt I think Haye beats him anyway. This should make the "Hayeters" happy. He's going to be a Wlad mandatory no matter what, its just a matter of time. If and when he does beat Povetkin, that alone would be good enough to warrant another title shot in my opinion.
Comment
-
Originally posted by ShamrockXpress View PostI would love to sees Haye-povetkin fight, I think it would be much more competitive fight (providing povetkin came in shape). I just wish Haye would be more active, I see both sides of this arguement, Haye is a name and is championship level, but then on the other side apart from his win over valuev (which I think he lost) and his fight against wlad his resume isn't all that impressive. Ideally I'd like to see any combination of fights between wlad, Haye, povetkin, boytsov, chagaev, fury, wilder, Scott, Jennings, Banks, adamek, arreola, chisora, helenius. As long as they were fighting each other instead of fighting cans waiting for a shot. Like we had in the 90s, you'd never get a fight like ibeabuchi-tua now if it wernt for a title.
Comment
-
he should yes but he will not
he certainly meets the criteria and a hell of a lot more to meet wlad after the recent garbage wlad has fought (not wlads fought the division is garbage)
the problem is ego, both hate each other, haye is better of getting the wba strap and then seeing how things develop
Comment
Comment