If Trout beats canelo, will Floyd fight him?

[The Big Dunn]

The only waste in this tread is you trying to saveahoe, that's it. With the smae lame excuse you always bring up. I notice how you haven't uttered a word about Floyd/Ghost in your response. Cause you's a liar. You also didn't utter a response about canelo/Trout cause you know canelo was in fact beating around the bush.

But to close the original argument, you, (a poster that believes Floyd can beat supermiddleweights) should be asking yourself why a guy that can beat 168lbers, won't fight any good jr middleweights. That makes you a walking contradiction, which you are to go along with major nutthugging. If you think the tread topic is a waste, stay the hell out.

You created a thread to whine about and label what floyd will do in september 2013 or may 2014 in march 2013 before he or either one of the possible oppnents have fought. What rational adult does something like that.

[Bushbaby]

You created a thread to whine about and label what floyd will do in september 2013 or may 2014 in march 2013 before he or either one of the possible oppnents have fought. What rational adult does something like that.

Maybe the same kind that says Floyd can beat 168lbers then weasel into every thread making excuses as to why he won't fight 154lbers?? Maybe??

[$tate of Mind]

That's a good question, I hope so but who knows? Floyd will follow the money. If he stays at WW I'd like to see him fight Bradley but we all know that's not happening. I'd love to see Floyd fight Trout.

[mathed]

Yeah, Floyd is gonna fight him alright, lmao.....sure.

[Jloro]

lol I feel like This fight might be easier for trout then we think. Canelos Defense is ass. He holds his hands up on each side of his face making it easier to hit, especially for a sneaky straight left lead I would expect. I'm sure he can fix this but I doubt he will. He looks big and strong but he couldn't really hurt a 40 year old mosley. So i doubt he's going to obliterate trout like people seem to think. He beat up lopez lolol. lol and even he had success hitting Canelo
Trout isn't a jr ww. WARTROUT

[thuggery]

it'd be a good fight

[#1Assassin]

as much as i like the way their styles would clash, i really dont want to see this fight. mayweather belongs at 147, anytime he fights at 154 he struggles to carry the weight and his performance is significantly diminished.

i dont want him or anyone else for that matter to lose because they werent at their best, if someone is gonna make history and take that 0 they should do it when hes at his best. he never forced anyone to fight where they arent comfortable so its not fair for ppl to expect him to fight where he isnt comfortable.

[The Big Dunn]

Maybe the same kind that says Floyd can beat 168lbers then weasel into every thread making excuses as to why he won't fight 154lbers?? Maybe??

I said hed be the betting favorite over dirrell and bute. How you twist that into me saying he beats 168lbers is ******ed.

I didn't make excuses as to why he won't fight 154lbers because he has fought two of them. I answered why he won't fight trout. You have a bad habit of taking an answer to a specific question and then applying it to a general question you didn't ask. That's garbage.

I gave you the reason I think he won't fight trout. Then you say I'm justifying his decision not to fight trout. Well he hasn't made the decision yet nor has he given a reason for it. You are simply irrational over this the same way you were irrational over canelo not fighting trout. You were wrong.

You've made up your mind that floyd will not fight trout and won't because he's a cherrypicker. You don't care about any facts that would make this assumption wrong. You want to bloviate and fit everything into your argument.

If you can't handle or don't respect a dissenting opinion then why create the thread? You just go overboard with your conspiracy theories sometimes dude.

[Bushbaby]

I said hed be the betting favorite over dirrell and bute. How you twist that into me saying he beats 168lbers is ******ed.

I didn't make excuses as to why he won't fight 154lbers because he has fought two of them. I answered why he won't fight trout. You have a bad habit of taking an answer to a specific question and then applying it to a general question you didn't ask. That's garbage.

I gave you the reason I think he won't fight trout. Then you say I'm justifying his decision not to fight trout. Well he hasn't made the decision yet nor has he given a reason for it. You are simply irrational over this the same way you were irrational over canelo not fighting trout. You were wrong.

You've made up your mind that floyd will not fight trout and won't because he's a cherrypicker. You don't care about any facts that would make this assumption wrong. You want to bloviate and fit everything into your argument.

If you can't handle or don't respect a dissenting opinion then why create the thread? You just go overboard with your conspiracy theories sometimes dude.

Nah, check that again. It was a simple question. Look through the tread. All your Fellow Floyd fans want the fight should he win. I can handle many things. But you bring up the same tired arguments over & over.

Like I said if the tread is worthless kick rocks. Unlike you, I don't care about how much a fighter makes, I care about who they fight. But you, you're crazy & quite frankly a liar. Did canelo finally decide to fight Trout, he sure did. But you amung others can go ahead & act like everything I said, (I) made up. But you know it's a fact canelo was trying to avoid the fight.

Furthermore you're still a walking contradiction. You're ok with a fighter you call the greatest of active fighters dishing out reasons why he won't fight the best. You'll say he can beat 168lbers then give excuses why he won't fight 154lbers that is fvccking crazy.

And to answer your question for the 2nd time, Miguel Cotto chose to fight Austin Trout, when he could have chosen canelo for more money.

[BoxingFollower]

No, I don't think Floyd Vs Austin Trout would happen.