If Trout beats canelo, will Floyd fight him?

[The Big Dunn]

Nah, check that again. It was a simple question. Look through the tread. All your Fellow Floyd fans want the fight should he win. I can handle many things. But you bring up the same tired arguments over & over.

Like I said if the tread is worthless kick rocks. Unlike you, I don't care about how much a fighter makes, I care about who they fight. But you, you're crazy & quite frankly a liar. Did canelo finally decide to fight Trout, he sure did. But you amung others can go ahead & act like everything I said, (I) made up. But you know it's a fact canelo was trying to avoid the fight.

Furthermore you're still a walking contradiction. You're ok with a fighter you call the greatest of active fighters dishing out reasons why he won't fight the best. You'll say he can beat 168lbers then give excuses why he won't fight 154lbers that is fvccking crazy.

And to answer your question for the 2nd time, Miguel Cotto chose to fight Austin Trout, when he could have chosen canelo for more money.

I thought Cotto fought trout because trout had just fought another puerto rican and miguels company was putting the fight on in msg and ppv in pr. Miguels company couldn't afford to promote and market a canelo fight in nyc. He didn't choose trout over canelo.

Did you ask who we want floyd to fight next? You asked a specific question which I answered, which other posters did as well. Everytime you ask the same question I give the same answer. If the question doesn't change why would the answer?

I never said that about 168lbers and told you exactly what I said. To keep repeating lies doesn't make it true. I gave answers to your question-you then tried to change what you were asking and apply the answer. That's not rational.

You don't know what canelo was doing. But since you were wrong now you have to post stuff like canelo was avoiding to make your rants justified when they were premature and wrong.

You are trying to make the reason floyd doesn't fight trout fit your sig. At this stage trying to do so is irrational. You tried to define canelo the same way and when he fought trout you had to back away. Now your on sergio. Its like you are just throwing stuff out there and seeing what sticks. It didn't stick with canelo so hey throw again. Hey it may not stick with floyd so throw again.

Just like canelo there is a possibility floyd won't fight trout. But you can't attribute them not fighting to anything at this point.

[Bushbaby]

I thought Cotto fought trout because trout had just fought another puerto rican and miguels company was putting the fight on in msg and ppv in pr. Miguels company couldn't afford to promote and market a canelo fight in nyc. He didn't choose trout over canelo.

Did you ask who we want floyd to fight next? You asked a specific question which I answered, which other posters did as well. Everytime you ask the same question I give the same answer. If the question doesn't change why would the answer?

I never said that about 168lbers and told you exactly what I said. To keep repeating lies doesn't make it true. I gave answers to your question-you then tried to change what you were asking and apply the answer. That's not rational.

You don't know what canelo was doing. But since you were wrong now you have to post stuff like canelo was avoiding to make your rants justified when they were premature and wrong.

You are trying to make the reason floyd doesn't fight trout fit your sig. At this stage trying to do so is irrational. You tried to define canelo the same way and when he fought trout you had to back away. Now your on sergio. Its like you are just throwing stuff out there and seeing what sticks. It didn't stick with canelo so hey throw again. Hey it may not stick with floyd so throw again.

Just like canelo there is a possibility floyd won't fight trout. But you can't attribute them not fighting to anything at this point.

I didn't attribute them not fighting to anything, special man, you did. I asked a simple question & instead of answering the question you gave the same excuse you always do as to why.

I'm not making anything to anything. You're the one with all the excuses . Now you're trying to turn it around on me, you're crazy. Go back & look through the tread. You're 1st post was an excuse. Then you brought all kind of other things up, you did that.

Then you have the nerve to post, " you can't attribute them not fighting to anything at this point". You're the one who's first post was an excuse to why they won't fight,lol.