All Time Great Or Great For His Era?
Collapse
-
-
Comment
-
I'm not saying you should. I was merely asking.
And as for the rest, I disagree but that's fair enough.Comment
-
I can agree in part about his resume with the caveat being the obscurity of his divisions makes it difficult to accurately guage how good his resume is. I don't think name value is the best way to evaluate a resume.
If James Toney fights Iran Barkley and Lopez fights some guy we don't know- most would say Barkley is better because of name value and they know he beat Hearns etc. But if Toney is -$250 favorite over Iran and Lopez is a -$250 favorite over "guy we don't know"-thats about an equal win to me.Comment
-
Comment
-
I didn't say anything about name value.I can agree in part about his resume with the caveat being the obscurity of his divisions makes it difficult to accurately guage how good his resume is. I don't think name value is the best way to evaluate a resume.
If James Toney fights Iran Barkley and Lopez fights some guy we don't know- most would say Barkley is better because of name value and they know he beat Hearns etc. But if Toney is -$250 favorite over Iran and Lopez is a -$250 favorite over "guy we don't know"-thats about an equal win to me.
James Toney simply beat much better fighters than Lopez did and I struggle to see how that's arguable.
I completely disagree with the last paragraph but fair enough.Comment
-
-
Comment
-
I wouldn't consider RJJ an all-time great. just great for his era. he should've rematch James Toney at a higher weight. and he should've rematched Hopkins when that fight was hot. he should've fought Lewis for 25 million and called up Tarver to fight at HW instead of going back down to lt HW.
if RJJ was able to come back from getting KTFO by Tarver and continue to win, then he'd be considered an ATGComment
Comment