Comments Thread For: Pianeta: I Will Shock The World, Knock Klitschko Out!

[paulf]

For me, his heavyweight blog is an excellent read.

Nice to see he is not afraid to offer a more honest perspective than the usual "politically correct" garbage.

What is the point in all those hours collecting these statistics and making these arguments? It seems... incredibly irrelevant.

People in any sport will always have to hear about how sportsmen were "better/tougher/smarter/stronger back in MY day" on and on with it. Putting together some statistics isn't going to change that.

I mean, some of this stuff is downright bizarre. Like this conclusion after running his numbers that "There are no other comparable boxers WITH LESS unavenged losses than Wladimir Klitschko."

What?

And then he makes a... well, he presents an opinion a fact... that avenging one's loss is completely irrelevant because the L is still on the record.

Talk about distorting reality to conform to your values. Objective? ****, how much more biased can you get?

Weird blog, man.

[hweightblogger]

Here it is you sob.

You should rather link to my original post, instead of quoting what I didn't say.

Here is the post of mine:

http://www.boxingscene.com/forums/showpost.php?p=13064147&postcount=31

And your post above proves my point very well: You completely fabricated it that I said "Holmes was a bum" or "Wlad would be laughed at for fighting prime Holmes". I didn't write anything of that sort.

[hweightblogger]

Hweightblogger, please explain how Holmes and Frazier were bums.

Holmes, Frazier, Ali were not bums. They were the opposite of bums.

I never claimed they were bums and I never will claim they were bums.

The posters here who say that "Hweightblogger claims Frazier was a bum" do so because of 2 reasons:

1) to discredit what I say
2) as a protective mechanism to keep their fantasies about the glorious past. They pretend that I have said ridiculous things to then be able to laugh and to reject them. It's a psychological mechanism to keep one's childhood and grandiosity delusions.

[hweightblogger]

What is the point in all those hours collecting these statistics and making these arguments? It seems... incredibly irrelevant.

The point is the same point why sports statistics are collected. Especially boxing fans are crazy about statistics like "Marciano is the greatest because he retired undefeated" or "The highest output of power punches ever recorded".

It's mainly AliFants who hate stats because Ali basically fails in every imaginable stat.

I mean, some of this stuff is downright bizarre. Like this conclusion after running his numbers that "There are no other comparable boxers WITH LESS unavenged losses than Wladimir Klitschko."

This is merely my response to the nonsense "ATGs avenged their losses while the Klitschkos didn't". You seem to have no idea what bizarre statements come out of the mouths of Klitschko haters.

And then he makes a... well, he presents an opinion a fact... that avenging one's loss is completely irrelevant because the L is still on the record.

Wow, are you claiming that avenging a loss makes the "L" disappear? Revisionism.

How about me claiming than an "L" makes the "W" disappear?

Hmm, let's wipe Frazier and Norton off Ali's record then.

Talk about distorting reality to conform to your values. Objective? ****, how much more biased can you get?
Weird blog, man.

Hahaha.

[hweightblogger]

"(Sonny Liston's wife and son were kidnapped by Muhammad Ali's ****** friends)."

You absolutely have to leve this little gem as to which there is NO proof to back it up.

This is a quote from a book not my invention.

[hweightblogger]

hwblogger, hello, I read your blog.

You seem to be quite mental.

That is all.

You seem to have no counter arguments. That is all.

[JAB5239]

This is a quote from a book not my invention.

And yet you used it in your ridiculous blog like it is a factual, when in fact its never been confirmed. In other words, you will use anything to suit your agenda.

[hweightblogger]

And yet you used it in your ridiculous blog like it is a factual, when in fact its never been confirmed. In other words, you will use anything to suit your agenda.

Yes, I am willing to quote books, even books that don't fit into the tiny world view of AliFants.

[JAB5239]

Yes, I am willing to quote books, even books that don't fit into the tiny world view of AliFants.

In other words....to suit your agenda! Thanks for admitting you have no objectivity!

[LacedUp]

Yes, I am willing to quote books, even books that don't fit into the tiny world view of AliFants.

Are you suggesting i made those quotes up? You are insane. Everyone Can GO back and look at your words. Remember we can see if you edited it ;-) you make out facts to back up your agenda. Facts can be twisted and turned, that's why it has no place in boxing. I can honestly say that I believe you are the only one on the planet who believes this is the best HW era ever. ******ed.