Who did Berto beat to be considered a top ww? Berto is a top 10 guy, a tough guy...but not a top ww. Berto has been exposed by two guys who fought him on the inside and he could not adjust.
I'm just telling you why your "He wasn't ranked" theory is wrong.
If you were to say "He shouldn't fight for the title because he was caught cheating" than that's fair enough.
But even then, he was still considered to be a Top WW at the time.
I don't agree...Berto has no belt and was not ranked...No matter how ya spin it,that fight should not have been for a belt...I wonder if this was Peterson would everyone feel the same way..
BTW This is what I said..^^^
Got to get that reading comprehension down bro...Why the hell would I bring up Peterson if I was not alluding to the whole PEDS situation??Come bro...
LOL go check his rec..29-0..Deal with it homie...LMAO..
Im not even a Pacquiao fan, so I don't care. Fact remains he didn't beat him and hasn't done **** at welterweight. Guerrero is more proven........ FACTS
Im not even a Pacquiao fan, so I don't care. Fact remains he didn't beat him and hasn't done **** at welterweight. Guerrero is more proven........ FACTS
I really don't care what kinda fan you are tbh..Oh but what I do know is you have no idea what the meaning of the word fact is..Fact is Bradley beat Pac and is still at this moment undefeated that's a fact...What ya just said(throughout ya whole post)is an opinion dumbazz...
Comment