Is Robert Guerrero a LEGIT Champioin??

Collapse
Collapse
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • IronDanHamza
    BoxingScene Icon
    Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
    • Oct 2009
    • 49466
    • 5,024
    • 270
    • 104,043

    #71
    Originally posted by Frank Ducketts
    Who did Berto beat to be considered a top ww? Berto is a top 10 guy, a tough guy...but not a top ww. Berto has been exposed by two guys who fought him on the inside and he could not adjust.
    He beat Zaveck who was a Top 5 WW at the time.

    Shows how weak 147 is, I know.

    Comment

    • Mr. Fantastic
      Banned
      Unified Champion - 10,00-20,000 posts
      • May 2008
      • 19036
      • 527
      • 1,328
      • 20,027

      #72
      Originally posted by Frank Ducketts
      Guerrero is a legit fighter. He is not the true champion until he beats Floyd.
      What if he fights and beats other champions in the division?


      As you could see...I'm not going to be a little bitch like you and BoxingDumbass and put you two on ignore when I make a thread.
      Last edited by Mr. Fantastic; 11-29-2012, 09:47 PM.

      Comment

      • Rome-By-Ko
        The winner Is
        Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
        • Mar 2009
        • 20157
        • 323
        • 332
        • 29,833

        #73
        Originally posted by IronDanHamza
        No.

        I'm just telling you why your "He wasn't ranked" theory is wrong.

        If you were to say "He shouldn't fight for the title because he was caught cheating" than that's fair enough.

        But even then, he was still considered to be a Top WW at the time.
        I don't agree...Berto has no belt and was not ranked...No matter how ya spin it,that fight should not have been for a belt...I wonder if this was Peterson would everyone feel the same way..

        BTW This is what I said..^^^

        Got to get that reading comprehension down bro...Why the hell would I bring up Peterson if I was not alluding to the whole PEDS situation??Come bro...

        Comment

        • Rome-By-Ko
          The winner Is
          Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
          • Mar 2009
          • 20157
          • 323
          • 332
          • 29,833

          #74
          Originally posted by Mr. Fantastic
          What if he fights and beats other champions in the division?
          Then of course he would be a Champion if he won...I think he is referring to the WBC belt...

          Comment

          • $coinblatt$
            Undisputed Champion
            Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
            • Oct 2010
            • 2193
            • 137
            • 91
            • 8,697

            #75
            Originally posted by Rome-By-Ko
            LOL go check his rec..29-0..Deal with it homie...LMAO..
            Im not even a Pacquiao fan, so I don't care. Fact remains he didn't beat him and hasn't done **** at welterweight. Guerrero is more proven........ FACTS

            Comment

            • -Huey-
              Toledo, Spain.
              Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
              • Feb 2010
              • 7812
              • 653
              • 382
              • 14,803

              #76
              Interim is not a straight up championship belt.

              Comment

              • Mr. Fantastic
                Banned
                Unified Champion - 10,00-20,000 posts
                • May 2008
                • 19036
                • 527
                • 1,328
                • 20,027

                #77
                Originally posted by -Huey-
                Interim is not a straight up championship belt.
                The same applies for anyone in any division correct? Not just Guerrero right?

                Comment

                • Rome-By-Ko
                  The winner Is
                  Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
                  • Mar 2009
                  • 20157
                  • 323
                  • 332
                  • 29,833

                  #78
                  Originally posted by Cuauhtli.
                  Im not even a Pacquiao fan, so I don't care. Fact remains he didn't beat him and hasn't done **** at welterweight. Guerrero is more proven........ FACTS
                  I really don't care what kinda fan you are tbh..Oh but what I do know is you have no idea what the meaning of the word fact is..Fact is Bradley beat Pac and is still at this moment undefeated that's a fact...What ya just said(throughout ya whole post)is an opinion dumbazz...

                  Comment

                  • mathed
                    molṑn labé
                    Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
                    • Feb 2009
                    • 54551
                    • 2,742
                    • 2,984
                    • 224,675

                    #79
                    The Ghost is a beast, he will be a test for anyone at 147.

                    Comment

                    • Rome-By-Ko
                      The winner Is
                      Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
                      • Mar 2009
                      • 20157
                      • 323
                      • 332
                      • 29,833

                      #80
                      Originally posted by Mr. Fantastic
                      The same applies for anyone in any division correct? Not just Guerrero right?
                      Has Maidana ever won a legit belt??I would lean towards no at first thought..But I could be wrong..

                      Comment

                      Working...
                      TOP