time and time again we learn that boxers > brawlers so why dont they change?

Collapse
Collapse
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • TensionKiller
    Pretty Please Unban PK
    Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
    • Sep 2012
    • 1346
    • 62
    • 15
    • 7,766

    #21
    The TS is desperate. If boxing only had pure technician's then many people would get bored from fighters to fans. There are reasons why some do what they do...


    Posted from Boxingscene.com App for Android

    Comment

    • viperz007
      Banned
      Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
      • May 2010
      • 2457
      • 89
      • 14
      • 2,638

      #22
      Originally posted by Saracen
      The TS is desperate. If boxing only had pure technician's then many people would get bored from fighters to fans. There are reasons why some do what they do...


      Posted from Boxingscene.com App for Android
      Class A brawlers > class A boxers

      There is a reason why they start boxing most of ehm got no chin

      And the only reason why boxers looks good is because they are matched with class c brawlers who are as good as a punching bag

      Comment

      • Rapid Counter
        Undisputed Champion
        Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
        • May 2011
        • 3164
        • 392
        • 724
        • 10,416

        #23
        Originally posted by STAX ON DECK
        well years of boxing will tell you that 99% of the time the pure boxers or technicians will always beat these mindless brawlers.
        Stopped reading after "99%"

        Comment

        • junior gong
          snr gong
          Unified Champion - 10,00-20,000 posts
          • May 2011
          • 11158
          • 1,160
          • 794
          • 18,973

          #24
          Originally posted by STAX ON DECK
          well years of boxing will tell you that 99% of the time the pure boxers or technicians will always beat these mindless brawlers. so why is it that guys like rios and mattyse and maidana dont learn from boxing history that theyre style wont amount to anything in the long run?

          once in a great while some will sneak thru the cracks and take a win but its very rare that u see this. i mean just look at manny pac who recently got exposed by both marquez and bradley, two pure boxers who made a dumb one dimensional puncher look clueless in the ring. in the same ring where these so call journalists and boxing websites put him at #1 pound for pound.

          peeps were propping up angulo for koing that bum in 1, yet put a guy like angulo vs someone like floyd and he gets picked apart like a dog. same with rios vs broner. yall can hype up all these mindless brawlers all u want but in the long run when they come up on some real ish they get taken apart and look clueless.
          Are you going for a record for a collection of the dumbest threads made in one day?

          Comment

          • Jel
            Banned
            Silver Champion - 100-500 posts
            • Nov 2012
            • 190
            • 7
            • 0
            • 295

            #25
            You are doing it wrong. You don't start trolling at 200 posts idiot.

            What you do is post like a normal person for 5000-6000 posts over a extended period of time and than suddenly break down (like that Pugugly,KingKhan guy on the other site) It makes it more funny.

            Comment

            • Dr Rumack
              I Also Cook
              Unified Champion - 10,00-20,000 posts
              • Oct 2012
              • 11870
              • 683
              • 303
              • 22,101

              #26
              Trolls seem to get a lot more mileage here than they do on most sites.

              Comment

              • mannyman
                Undisputed Champion
                Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
                • Jun 2009
                • 1150
                • 35
                • 22
                • 8,593

                #27
                Dumb question really. Not all brawlers have the skill to box thats why they opt for a brawling style. Its the different styles that make boxing great and its always interesting to so who'll win between the classic boxer vs brawler.

                Comment

                • Daddy T
                  BigDaddy
                  Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
                  • Aug 2010
                  • 5637
                  • 198
                  • 156
                  • 12,260

                  #28
                  I had a feeling given the title of this thread that it would be ******ed, I checked in just to be sure and yup, I wasn't dissapointed.

                  Comment

                  • STAX ON DECK
                    Banned
                    Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
                    • Nov 2012
                    • 3990
                    • 324
                    • 134
                    • 6,094

                    #29
                    Originally posted by Rapid Counter
                    Stopped reading after "99%"
                    its obv not 99% to be exact but it high up there. feel free to give me a few example of mindless brawlers with no skill who beat up on pure boxing technicians. please feel free i can wait.

                    Comment

                    • Deevel916
                      Undisputed Champion
                      Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
                      • Feb 2010
                      • 7068
                      • 282
                      • 47
                      • 13,675

                      #30
                      Anyone have any explanation why a boxing match between 2 technical boxers has never been chosen as FOTY?

                      Comment

                      Working...
                      TOP