Comments Thread For: Manny Pacquiao: I Believe Mayweather is Avoiding Me

[GRUSTLER]

You don't know the difference between "better win" vs "triangle theories".



TriangleRUSTY.

Lol I love it.

Ok then explain these posts you put out there and explain the difference between a "triangle theory" and a "better win"

Regarding Soto, yes that was a very solid reason. I put Soto in the same boat as Rios. Just like I knew Rios would defeat Alvarado when moving up in weight, "regardless" of the fact that he was moving up in weight and never fought at 140.

I think a potential fight between Garcia-Mathysse would play out based off who Mathysse fought, I would use the Soto fight as a reference. Off the top of my head, I think they're rather similar. Sure Soto was moving up in weight, but I think he's more than capable of beating a lot of 140 lbers

Explain these posts. Are you telling me that these are not triangle theory post? I dare you to say no. Man, you look like a JACK ASS more and more everyday.

[combatron]

floyd must be planning his vacation right now

[djtmal]

in the great debate, on the neverending saga of the manny vs floyd, "who's ducking who the most category, manny pacquaio, is heading down the home stretch like seattle slew in the triple crown days...lol

[GRUSTLER]

That's not what you said.

I have exactly what you said in my sig chump

You are trying so I'll give you an E for effort but your are trying to run a race on a tread mill. You are the twist master.

[BoxingGenius27]

Ok then explain these posts you put out there and explain the difference between a "triangle theory" and a "better win"






Explain these posts. Are you telling me that these are not triangle theory post? I dare you to say no. Man, you look like a JACK ASS more and more everyday.

I see you still struggle to understand even though you asked me this same question a few days ago and I clearly explained it. In fact, others commented saying they understood exactly where I was coming from except you.

Here let me show you again to be the non comprehending dummy:

Listen dummy lol

Since you have such a hard time understanding things, let me try to make it more simple.

In other words, what I said was if we're going to compare styles and use your triangle theories when evaluating potential fights, comparing Soto to Garcia is better than comparing Khan/Morales to Mathysse or comparing Alexander/Judah to Garcia.

Do you understand now you triangle theory using bucket head dummy?

Your ass is over here talking about "Garcia beat Khan who beat Judah who beat Mathysse is some kind of measuring stick" LMAO

While we're at it, Garcia beat Morales who beat Pac, so I guess Garcia can beat Pac also.

Wait, let's take it a step further. Johnson beat Sanchez who beat Mayweather. I guess Johnson can knock Mayweather out in the first round like he did Sanchez.

Now taking it back to what I said, I said if you're gonna evaluate a potential fight, take fighters with the same style that fought the guys you're comparing.

For example dummy, if you're gonna evaluate how a potential Mayweather-Pac fight would play out, use someone like JMM when he fought Pac. Don't use someone like Margarito when trying to figure out how Pac-Mayweather could potentially play out you dumb fcuking excuse for a boxing fan lol

So what I did was I took Soto's fighting style (flat footed slugger who likes to ****) and compared it with what I've seen Garcia do in his fights. It was the closest thing I could find given Mathysse's opponents.

I know this will fly over your head again like it did the other 40 times.

Go back to the Pac-Mayweather main thread. You have about 9,000 posts relating to Pac-Mayweather. You and Tatangb45 belong together. It's obvious that's all your good for.


Peace.

[GRUSTLER]

That's not what you said.

I have exactly what you said in my sig chump

Marquez was/is the Lightweight you JACK ASS! You don't even understand anything. Floyd out classed JMM and is a better counter puncher/boxer than him and that's why he beats Manny. Who the hell do you think I was talking about? Man, you are pathetic.

[GRUSTLER]

I see you still struggle to understand even though you asked me this same question a few days ago and I clearly explained it. In fact, others commented saying they understood exactly where I was coming from except you.

Here let me show you again to be the non comprehending dummy:

those are triangle theory posts. When you put "I think" and "off the top of my head" and compare Soto to Garcia when Soto has never fought at JWW prior to losing to Matthysse and putting Soto and Rios in the same boat? How can you predict how a fight would turn out against Garcia/Matthysse by the win over Soto? AND then you go on to say that Soto is capable of beating any of the top 140LB fighters? No one agrees with that. That's a theory that doesn't add up. I just don't get your outlook and that's the problem. You are steady getting on me about triangle theories but you already copped twice to what I was saying BUT you still continue to mock me. That's weak sauce.

[GRUSTLER]

For example dummy, if you're gonna evaluate how a potential Mayweather-Pac fight would play out, use someone like JMM when he fought Pac. Don't use someone like Margarito when trying to figure out how Pac-Mayweather could potentially play out you dumb fcuking excuse for a boxing fan lol

Boxing......27, So you are saying that the only way you can compare fighters and who will win is if they fought someone similar prior to facing each other? Seriously that is the dumbest thing I have EVER heard. Not everyone has the same style or similar you JACK ASS. When you compare fighters everything plays a factor in a match up EVERYTHING.

So what I did was I took Soto's fighting style (flat footed slugger who likes to ****) and compared it with what I've seen Garcia do in his fights. It was the closest thing I could find given Mathysse's opponents.

So you seriously compared Soto to Garcia because they're flat footed and like to slug? Garcia is a counter puncher with timing and he is at a higher weight, undefeated. This sounds ******. Garcia is clearly in a better position and fresher as a fighter than Soto. Soto lost his first time moving up and Garcia is at the top of the division Soto lost in. Not a good comparison.

[djtmal]

honestly man, floyd mayweather jr., doesn't have any more options than manny pacquaio....really...couple of years ago, he had shane and cotto...respectable fighters that would sell, but all due respect, both guys had been battered pretty good already....hate to say it, but this keeps floyd mayweather jr., waaaaay out of pernell whitakers reach imo, cause pernell whitaker, would have wanted to get a prime manny pacquaio, so as to leave no doubt...

[GRUSTLER]

Boxing....27 is the same guy that took what Naazim Richardson said about a potential Garcia/Matthysse fight:

Another fighter who wants to fight Garcia in the future is the feared puncher Lucas Matthysse (32-2, 30KOs) of Argentina.

"Tough fight for both of them. I think Danny's boxing skills are little bit better than Matthysse. But, Mattyhsse is one of the few guys that Danny would face as a champion that might be able to take some of [his punches] too. I think he can take it better than [Amir] Khan or [Erik] Morales can, and he can give it back too. Danny is not going away quietly...no matter what happens. If you can get on the scale and make 140, and Danny gets on the scale and makes 140 - you got a problem. No matter who you are, you got a problem," Naazim said.

Article Link - http://www.boxingscene.com/?m=show&o...#ixzz2AYGojHVV

And translated it to this:

He did if you know how to read in between the lines.

He said Garcia wouldn't have problems with Judah = Garcia will beat Judah.

When talking about Mathysse, he only said Garcia will be a "problem" for anyone lol In other words, that's a nice way of saying Garcia will put up a fight but he's not convinced Garcia will win.

Pretty simple stuff here.

My guess is because Garcia is a fellow Phillidelphia fighter, saying "no matter what happens, Garcia will be a problem", is a nice way of saying Garcia will go out fighting, but he's not confident Garcia wins that fight.

For the record, when Richardson said "No matter what happens, Garcia will be a problem for anyone", he's basically saying he feels Garcia puts up a good fight, but he's not convinced Garcia beats Mathysse. That's why he says "NO MATTER WHAT HAPPENS", meaning if Mathysse busts dat ass, Garcia will go out fighting.

You clearly disregarded when Naazim said Garcia skills were a bit better than Matthysse and he is a problem for anyone. Where did you interpret your meaning from? This is the point I'm trying to make. Your reading and comprehension skills are suspect. You do everything to fit your agenda. You remind me of a guy on here some time ago but he was definitely smarter than you his name was "Jroles" or something like this. We went at it many times but to compare you to him would be an insult and I never liked him.