Comments Thread For: Sergio Martinez: Mayweather is The Best, But I Beat Him!

[I Love Jesus!]

You give Pac full credit for Pac officially losing to a 140 pounder in Bradley while discrediting Floyd for KTFO of a bigger 140 pounder in hatton that once you claimed Floyd would duck if Hatton would destroyed Castillo bwhahahaha..............

how do you know what he once claimed? Are you an alt who came back after being banned? Reported

[M4RK]

I just wanna see these two fight. They can determine the weight,i just wanna see boxing.

This is my megafight

Could not have said it better myself!

[HeroBando]

The funny thing to me is that since 2007, Mayweather and Pacquaio have 5 common opponents. Outside the 5 common opponents, Mayweather has fought Ortiz, who was best available welterweight outside of Pac at the time. Pac has fought Clottey and Margarito, both of whom were coming off loses when they fought Pac. And of the common opponents since 2007, Mayweather fought all but one before Pac. So please explain to me how Mayweather is constantly lambasted and labeled a ducker, cherrypicker, blah, blah, blah why Pacquaio is simultaneously having his balls massaged as a "take-on-all-comers warrior."

Let me break something to you: Ortiz is straight trash. He has 1 win over a solid opponent in 5 tries, and that came at a catchweight.

[hitking]

Let me break something to you: Ortiz is straight trash. He has 1 win over a solid opponent in 5 tries, and that came at a catchweight.

OK. Let's say Ortiz is "trash.". That does nothing to answer my proposed question. Which is why has Mayweather been labeled a ducker, cherrypicker, etc, etc, etc and Pac been praised as a take-on-all-comers warrior when they basically fought the exact same opponents over the last five years? And of the common opponents, all were over 30 and Mayweather fought all but Cotto first. So exactly how were these common opponents, which were older and more used when Pac fought them, good enough to validate Pac's greatness? But they're labeled ****ty nobodies when Mayweather fought younger, fresher versions of them?

[Carpe Diem]

The best? At what? Certainly its not boxing after Cotto beat his ass and got robbed.

The same Cotto that Pac destroyed easily and made do the moonwalk for half the fight

And actually the version that Pac fought was closer to prime

[HeroBando]

OK. Let's say Ortiz is "trash.". That does nothing to answer my proposed question. Which is why has Mayweather been labeled a ducker, cherrypicker, etc, etc, etc and Pac been praised as a take-on-all-comers warrior when they basically fought the exact same opponents over the last five years? And of the common opponents, all were over 30 and Mayweather fought all but Cotto first. So exactly how were these common opponents, which were older and more used when Pac fought them, good enough to validate Pac's greatness? But they're labeled ****ty nobodies when Mayweather fought younger, fresher versions of them?

I wasn't gonna try answering that question, there's probably 10000 threads about that. Just wanted to present this underexposed fact, related to your post

[hitking]

I wasn't gonna try answering that question, there's probably 10000 threads about that. Just wanted to present this underexposed fact, related to your post

When Ortiz fought Mayweather, he was The Ring magazine's #3 rated welterweight behind Mayweather and Pacquaio. He was also coming off that ONE win you claim he has over a solid opponent. How exactly is one blasted for fighting him? But I mean, this is the guy who was blasted for fighting Baldomir, who was the legitimate welterweight champ. This is the guy who was blasted for fighting JMM, who came back and bested the welterweight people claim is better than Mayweather. So its no surprise.

[mathed]

Ducking My Potna Golovkin already huh? has you and your scumbag promoter shook

Golovkin needs to earn his shot, Sergio is the man now. 3G had one fight on HBO in his whole career, lol..............he isn't deserving of a fight of that magnitude based on his accomplishments.

[twosweethooks]

Why doesn't Mayweather get credit for wipin the floor with wee little JMM when wee little JMM a couple years later turned around and wiped the floor with the great Wapakman??? Makes no sense from where I'm sitting.

Reasons :

1. Mayweather is at least one to one and half weight classes above Pac man

2. Mayweather "WAS" at least 2 to 2/2 weight classes above JMM,,,JMM was fighting at 130 in Pacs 2nd fight ,,, further mang, JR CHEATED in the weight department and who knows what weight he came in at, thats why Jr don't get an ounce of credit for whuppin JMM

3. you don't know boxing very well mang, JMM has NEVER wiped the nice floor with Pac mang , LOL

see if dat helps from where you are sittin mang

[hitking]

Golovkin needs to earn his shot, Sergio is the man now. 3G had one fight on HBO in his whole career, lol..............he isn't deserving of a fight of that magnitude based on his accomplishments.

Exactly what has Chavez Jr done in his career to "earn" a shot at Martinez?