Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Comments Thread For: R. Mayweather Jabs Miguel: Floyd Beat Cotto's Ass Easy

Collapse
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • #61
    Originally posted by SkillspayBills View Post
    I wouldn't call it "easy" but I don't know a single sane human being who thought the fight was closer the second time they watched it. Fight was much less cmpetitive after watching it again.
    Because the second time you watch any fight you already
    know the outcome of it so your mind its already set on the
    winner...

    Comment


    • #62
      A lot you must not have a clue on how to score a boxing match. Competitive and close are two completely different things. It was a VERY competitive fight but a FAR from close boxing match. In case you are not aware boxing matches are scored round by round, where each round is scored individually and not judged like a street fight. I know you guys know this but some of your comments suggest otherwise. Judged how a boxing match is suppose to be judged this wasn't close but if you judge it like a fight were damage (nose bleed) and being physical (lifting in the air and wrestling) accounts for much more the fight was close.

      It's boxing not fighting.
      Last edited by jayjames616; 05-26-2012, 11:45 AM.

      Comment


      • #63
        Originally posted by amayseng View Post
        if easy means that floyd lost 5 rounds to cotto while having a busted and bleeding nose for 9 of 12 and made comments that a past prime war torn and battered cotto was his toughest fight ever, then ya ok.
        What 5 rounds did Floyd lose in this fight? Cotto is 31 and pass his prime..? Man I would love to get in the ring with some of these fans and see if they talk crazy after they experience what it feels like to be in there.

        A bloody nose is nothing, last time I checked Cotto messed up Margarito's eye some more, and busted Pac's ear drum. Now which is worse a nose bleed that will stop, or a busted ear drum? But keep trying to discredit 43-0 punk

        Comment


        • #64
          Originally posted by jayjames616 View Post
          A lot you must not have a clue on how to score a boxing match. Competitive and close are two completely different things. It was a VERY competitive fight but a FAR from close boxing match. In case you are not aware boxing matches are scored round by round, where each round is scored individually and not judged like a street fight. I know you guys know this but some of your comments suggest otherwise. Judged how a boxing match is suppose to be judged this wasn't close but if you judge it like a fight were damage (nose bleed) and being physical (lifting in the air and wrestling) accounts for much more the fight was close.

          It's boxing not fighting.
          boxing is fighting.

          Its just another form.

          Comment


          • #65
            Originally posted by jayjames616 View Post
            A lot you must not have a clue on how to score a boxing match. Competitive and close are two completely different things. It was a VERY competitive fight but a FAR from close boxing match. In case you are not aware boxing matches are scored round by round, where each round is scored individually and not judged like a street fight. I know you guys know this but some of your comments suggest otherwise. Judged how a boxing match is suppose to be judged this wasn't close but if you judge it like a fight were damage (nose bleed) and being physical (lifting in the air and wrestling) accounts for much more the fight was close.

            It's boxing not fighting.
            when was the last boxing match you saw and said the judges
            did a good job scoring the fight...

            Comment


            • #66
              Originally posted by DTMB View Post
              boxing is fighting.

              Its just another form.
              Boxing is a combat sport with rules and a scoring system.

              Comment


              • #67
                Originally posted by jose830 View Post
                when was the last boxing match you saw and said the judges
                did a good job scoring the fight...
                Mayweather vs Cotto and Canelo vs Mosley

                Comment


                • #68
                  What is this nonsense of Floyd winning easy? Majority of people(based on the polls here), gave Cotto four rounds. Even if you gave Miguel 2 or 3, there was plenty of swing rounds. Very few rounds did we see Mayweather destroy in, it was a close fight. On the cards you may of seen 9 rounds to 3 but almost every round was close and a few punches going the other way could of went to the other fighter. Roger is a ******.

                  Comment


                  • #69
                    roger dont know **** about boxing

                    Comment


                    • #70
                      Originally posted by Check View Post
                      What is this nonsense of Floyd winning easy? Majority of people(based on the polls here), gave Cotto four rounds. Even if you gave Miguel 2 or 3, there was plenty of swing rounds. Very few rounds did we see Mayweather destroy in, it was a close fight. On the cards you may of seen 9 rounds to 3 but almost every round was close and a few punches going the other way could of went to the other fighter. Roger is a ******.
                      It was FAR from easy it just wasn't close. It was hard fought but Floyd was winning the rounds.

                      Comment

                      Working...
                      X
                      TOP