Maskaev Getting Screwed!!

[Manny_P]

You keep talking about some magical ranking that doesn't exsist.

There were a lot of people who ranked Brewster above the other three because he fought more frequently agaisnt better competiton.

Since Lewis retired, the rankings have been very subjective.

Because none of them fought each other, it left a lot of room for debate.

This is still the case, but it now seems like unification my be a step closer.

We can hope at least.

hahahahahaha.

[MetalVomit]

You keep talking about some magical ranking that doesn't exsist.

There were a lot of people who ranked Brewster above the other three because he fought more frequently agaisnt better competiton.

Since Lewis retired, the rankings have been very subjective.

Because none of them fought each other, it left a lot of room for debate.

This is still the case, but it now seems like unification my be a step closer.

We can hope at least.

Brewster beat Wlad, and all claim that he's a nobody anyway. He has fought frequently, but I consider Byrd and Ruiz better than him because they've been champions longer and still are after Brewster has now won a belt. So Brewster should have to beat the ones that have reigned longer than him to settle the debate. That's the way I look at it. All I'm saying is none of them are champion until they beat each other, to state a case. Vitali, I considered the best at the time, because he lost to The Man(Lewis), and successfully challenged for The Man's title after The Man retired. Ruiz and Byrd were not better than Vitali, because they had not challenged Vitali, to state a case.

[Bozo_no no]

Brewster beat Wlad, and all claim that he's a nobody anyway. He has fought frequently, but I consider Byrd and Ruiz better than him because they've been champions longer and still are after Brewster has now won a belt. So Brewster should have to beat the ones that have reigned longer than him to settle the debate. That's the way I look at it. All I'm saying is none of them are champion until they beat each other, to state a case. Vitali, I considered the best at the time, because he lost to The Man(Lewis), and successfully challenged for The Man's title after The Man retired. Ruiz and Byrd were not better than Vitali, because they had not challenged Vitali, to state a case.

It just seemed like you were trying to educate him with your opinion like it was factual.

Vitali LOST to Lennox Lewis (that does nothing to raise your stock in a rankings sense) and in the two years after that, beat an overweight Johnsons, and two fringe contenders in Williams and Sanders.

That in no way mande him a proven and accepted #1.

Brewster's wins over Wlad Golota and Krasniqi were better than anything Byrd and Ruiz have done in reccent memory.

I don't disagree with your ranking, you're entitled to that opinion and I can see it,

but you can't talk about your opinionated rankings like they're factual.

That seemed to be what you were doing.

[Manny_P]

It just seemed like you were trying to educate him with your opinion like it was factual.

Vitali LOST to Lennox Lewis (that does nothing to raise your stock in a rankings sense) and in the two years after that, beat an overweight Johnsons, and two fringe contenders in Williams and Sanders.

That in no way mande him a proven and accepted #1.

Brewster's wins over Wlad Golota and Krasniqi were better than anything Byrd and Ruiz have done in reccent memory.

I don't disagree with your ranking, you're entitled to that opinion and I can see it,

but you can't talk about your opinionated rankings like they're factual.

That seemed to be what you were doing.

exactly......

[MetalVomit]

[QUOTE=Bozo_no_no]It just seemed like you were trying to educate him with your opinion like it was factual.

I wasnt trying to make my opinion factual at all. I just had to over-explain how I see it, because he was acting like he didnt understand what I was trying to say. I initially just said how I see it, and had to keep making it meticulously easier to understand for that simple minded child, that's all. We all have different opinions about it. Bottom line=**** Ruiz

[!!Captain]

No matter what happens and what the thread is about, we all seem to come to one discussion in the end: How good/bad are/were Klitschko brother(s).

[Bozo_no no]

No matter what happens and what the thread is about, we all seem to come to one discussion in the end: How good/bad are/were Klitschko brother(s).

Actually, the current rankings are being discussed, but it's nice to see which part you immediatly focus on.

[!!Captain]

Actually, the current rankings are being discussed, but it's nice to see which part you immediatly focus on.

Read the last couple of pages, there is probably 2-3 posts that DON'T mention them. Hard to focus on something else when their names are flying all over the place.

[badblood]

This thread got kind of out of hand.

[!!Captain]

This thread got kind of out of hand.

That's what I was trying to prove to Bozo