Comments Thread For: Roy Jones: I'd Beat Mayweather, Pacquiao a Tough Style

[ADP02]

why are you getting defensive?

Roy is getting senile. Manny would be a fucking sitting duck in the ring with prime Roy. Mayweather would give him more issues do to being a complete fighter, not to mention he is a master strategist in the ring. Something Manny severely lacks.

This.......rjj is clearly nut riding pac to say hed be more difficult for him than floyd. ITS laughable actually

roy's a ****in' idiot

you'd beat floyd but pac is the harder fighter to figure out? give me a ****ing break, dude. james toney is floyd without the movement you dunce

and to the guy above me........floyd can't handle a fighter with speed? SERIOUSLY?

So sad to see pitiful Roy Jones trying to remain relevant. Jones will be remembered for his losses and KO's by Tarver-Johnson and the Aussie. so sad but he deserves every bad thing going on in his life. dumb management poor fight choices. sad.

why are you getting defensive?

Why are you all so defensive?

He believes that he can out beat Floyd because he has already seen that defense before and Floyd uses his defense to win him fights ..... if someone can break thru that defense then Floyd would be in big trouble.

[Someone88]

James Toney says that because he is VERY VERY TIGHT with the Roach family. I mean Roach was Toneys trainer when he got caught using steroids. We can't take his opinion seriously.

Toney is from the same Michigan as well like Mayweather, he talked well of him he's good with Pacquiao too so I don't know if he was really biased he just thinks Pacquiao would ko Mayweather

[ricky1978]

LMAO at your comment....

[Someone88]

oh gawd you nut rider, kill yourself. just do it for everyone here.

Settle down just deal with it RJJ sees Pacquiao as the harder fight for him and sees Pacquiao as the better fighter than Mayweather as well it's ok stop crying

[gquezvas]

just this small piece tells me how butthurt you are.

YES! like roy said, once you overcome the power, you "deal" with pac. and it's not like pac is an offensive rubik's cube. he comes forward in straight lines, is easy to hit, but throws punches with speed and power. morales, marquez and even oldsley showed us that he can be neutralized with movement and smart counter punching, both of which prime roy was exceptional in doing, among a list of other things. both fighters are fun to watch and it would definitely be a good fight to see. don't think it would go the distance.

Dude stop hating on everyone who is not Floyd. RJJ was faster then Floyd and hit like Pacquiao. He had better knowledge then both. He lost as he got older and took greater challenges. Stop hating puto!

[straightleft]

RJ would toy and stop both "versions" of pac. style wise, mayweather @ 130 vs prime roy would be a hell of a fight though.

You talk like you box for life and eating boxing champ left and right. I take RJJ words anyday than your ***** coming from your mouth.

[ThePunchingBag]

Roy knows his weakness is his chin. A fast Southpaw with power could fck him up.

Jones overwhelms Mayweather's defense and counterpunching style.

[FalconPunch]

He probably would beat either guy.

[wmute]

He is talking about the current version of Mayweather (otherwise he would not make the comparison with Toney). So he is right. Then again, 34.5yo version of Roy (Tarver 1) looked a lot worse than 34.5yo version of Floyd (Ortiz), so he is probably picking his prime self vs aged Mayweather.

He is also right that his lack of (or rather his constant and repeated choice not to apply) fundamentals, would make Pac a bit problematic.

[John Barron]

Dude stop hating on everyone who is not Floyd. RJJ was faster then Floyd and hit like Pacquiao. He had better knowledge then both. He lost as he got older and took greater challenges. Stop hating puto!

i don't know how to respond to you since you can't even seem to comprehend what you quoted...

You talk like you box for life and eating boxing champ left and right. I take RJJ words anyday than your ***** coming from your mouth.

so morales-pacquiao I, a loss for pacquiao, yes or no? according to roy "that has still yet to be seen."

maybe you should apply that flawless logic of yours the next time you're crying in another thread about some other fighter/trainer picking mayweather to win or praising him over your hero. you and your kind seem to be better at it.