No doubt that JMM was/is the batter technitian and I think he'd win a MD/UD. However Hamed would have a puncher's chance. Hamed is arguably the most powerful puncher at featherweight of all time.
Jmm versus Hamed at 126.who wins and why
Collapse
-
-
Comment
-
whats with people acting like Pacquiao couldn't hit at FW? I got into boxing back in 03 and Pacquiao was at the very top of the list of the current hardest p4p punchers. He decked everyone with his left hand and FW.
Hamed had good power and knocked out a lot of average oponent's in spectacular fashion, but stop acting like he hits any harder than Pac.
Pacquiao would have brutalized Kevin Kelly.Comment
-
Comment
-
Hamed wins.
JMM ducked this guy for a reason.
He was offered a career high payday and turned it down because, in his own words, "[JMM] needed more time to train for his style...he is a awkward fighter like Norwood and his style presents a lot of problems".Comment
-
Comment
-
Nope.....Naz is clearly to hardest puncher 126 and below (in the history of boxing).
If you followed the sport around that time, then you would know that he was rated as p4p a harder puncher than guys like Tyson, Tua, Trinidad or anyone else in the sport of boxing.
FWIW, It's just not just me saying this....this was pretty much the universal opinion back then.Comment
-
I wouldn't say that. I'd say Arguello is probably the hardest ****er in the lower weights.
Hamed hit hard for sure but he's generally only hyped up by british people, I'm not even trying to be a hater.
He's in the top 5 for the hardest hitter def though. Probably hit a wee bit harder than Pac but Pac lands twice as much.Comment
-
Comment
Comment