Jmm versus Hamed at 126.who wins and why

Collapse
Collapse
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • zab191
    Contender
    • Sep 2011
    • 465
    • 13
    • 0
    • 6,655

    #101
    Hamed would have no chance. Marquez too clever. Hamed would get eaten far worse than what Barrera did to him.

    Comment

    • Cardinal Buck
      Undisputed Champion
      Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
      • Nov 2011
      • 1757
      • 75
      • 186
      • 8,133

      #102
      Originally posted by Cuauhtémoc1502
      I think it's funny how the legend of Naz has grown, it's almost as bad as Tyson's legend. Naz can now beat anyone under 150lbs....lol

      JMM gives Naz an even worse boxing lesson than Barrera did, it's not even close. He was more careful than Barrera and much more skilled counter puncher which is perfect for the style Naz brings.

      Of course Naz has a punchers chance but skill wise, it's not very close.

      JMM by clear UD.
      It's the opposite. Naz would be a 3 or 4:1 favorite had this fight actually been scheduled.

      Comment

      • sammiza567
        Interim Champion
        Gold Champion - 500-1,000 posts
        • Jun 2006
        • 818
        • 32
        • 0
        • 7,321

        #103
        jmm would outclass him just bad styles. jmm would do work on hamed.

        Comment

        • .::|ULTIMATE|::.
          Gran Campeon
          Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
          • May 2004
          • 6222
          • 443
          • 474
          • 13,409

          #104
          JMM is a first Ballot Hall of Famer... One of the Top Fighters of all time.... Frankly this question is almost insulting to JMM.

          There is a reason Hamed avoided JMM like the Plague. Then chose the smaller man between Morales vs Barrera to fight when he had no choice. We all saw what happened he didn't belong in the same sentence much less in the same ring as them.

          Comment

          Working...
          TOP