Tweet
inb4 16 punch combo
-
-
i agree, marquez needs to stop piggybacking on the 3 rounds he won against pac
if i was marquez, id actually do anything to have people forget about this , because the ENTIRE world is able to see the following photos/ video
Comment
-
Yeah but like..did any of those people watch the fight through a magnifying glass and on ultra high def slow mo whilst wearing their Pacquiao cap, Pacquiao t-shirt, Pacquiao trousers, Pacquiao socks, Pacquiao shoes, and Pacquiao scarf on whilst holding on to their Pacquiao doll sitting in their living room with Pacquiao posters up everywhere..?
I think you would see the fight in a different light if you did.Comment
-
Man u are a fool! Based on your logic we should judge a winner based on how they look like at the post fight news conference? So by your logic Nonitos last fight he really lost because his face was all scratched and swollen and the other guy was clean. Forget the fact that it was a near shut out for Nonito because by your logic it's about how the fighter looks after the fight. Not he fact thy PAC was lost and had no answers for dinamita! Not the fact
That PAC never showed the confidence that he did in the previous two matches with JMM.
Comment
-
Being the first person to stop a still VERY capable Casamayor, KO'ing a near top 10 P4P ranked Juan Diaz, and stopping a still live Katsidis.....
Marquez has a very solid resume over the past 4 years alone, nevermind his earlier days.Comment
-
Have you watched the Marquez-John fight ever??? JMM won that fight, I don't care what anyone says. Chris John is a really good fighter, but there's a reason he only fights in Indonesia and only fights someone like Rocky Juarez in the USA. If Marquez-John happened in Vegas, Marquez would have won a decision no doubt. John didn't hardly land s**t that whole fight, was backing up and not hitting back 75% of the time, Marquez was pressing the action. If Marquez was pressing the action and John was landing on him, than it's non-effective agression, but John was doing hardly anything that entire fight. The fact that John was scored the winner by as wide of a UD as he was is laughable, let alone the fact that he was declared the winner. And the low blows weren't even bad, certainly not bad enough to warrant multiple point deductions. It was like Khan being deducted twice for pushing, very questionable and didn't really warrant it.
Norwood was a clear as day robbery, and I think Pac-JMM II was as well. I scored Pac-JMM II 115-112 Marquez. I thought Marquez won 8 rounds to 4, but was knocked down once obviously. It was the clearest of all 3 of the fights to me. I thought Pac won the first fight by a point, it was close. Marquez won more rounds, but the 3 knockdowns won the fight for Pac to me. The 3rd fight was close, and I originally scored it a draw. Having watched it a few more times, it could have gone either way to me.
JMM wins: Peden, Medina, Gainer, Salido, Polo, Barrera, Juarez, Casamayor, Diaz, and Katsidis.
At first glance of Marquez' wins, his resume seems to be a bit weak. Barrera was past his prime by the time he fought Marquez and the 2nd Pac fight in 07'. His best win aside form that is probably a past prime-still good Casamayor or Orlando Salido, which isn't ATG status. But, given the fact that he should without a doubt have wins over Norwood, Pacquiao, and John as well, those are all good wins. Norwood would have been a really good win at that time, John would be a very very good win, and Pacquiao would be an ATG win. To me, JMM is an ATG still. He was robbed probably more so than other fight in his era, even more than Winky Wright.Comment
Comment