-
-
For all you haters still claiming Vitali's quit job vs Byrd was heartless... why don't you explain Lewis' quit job vs the same said fighter. At least Vitali went 9 full rds with him before giving away his bel;t to him on a platter.. Lewis gave away his belt so he didn't have to go in the ring with Byrd.. No wonder he's beaten every man he's ever faced.. the ones he hasn't faced involve throwing his belts in the trash vs Byrd & Ruiz & eventually the last belt he had remaining for not facing Klitschko a second time..
This is the alltime great you place in front of Vitali.. one who's gotten ktfo twice by fighters that were worthy of being mentioned in the same brethren as one of Klitschko's poor competition. & before you say Mccall & RAHMAN were champions..... JUST REMEMBER who gave them that opportunity to be called champs in the first place.. I ask how one can place a fighter as superior to another when he's exhibited less superior qualities.. So what we're saying is that it's better to go out on your shield & get KTFO twice with 2 shots causing the damage then to go out on your shield due to cuts & injuries incurred in a bout..
Where's the logic here.. Vitali has a better record than him.. better numbers.. was better head to head against Lewis.. OVERALL has dominated his foes more thoroughly than Lewis has & also has taken on the same opposition 82% winning just like Lewis did before him.. has won some form of the 4 major belts acknowledged today 3 separate times.. same as Lewis.. has a similar championship bout record (13-2).... where the hell is he in any way shape or form inferior to Lewis? I wanna Know.
He has a few more spectacular KO'S? iS tHAT IT? WeLL kLITSCHKO MAKES up for that by scoring more stoppages regardless of the highlight reel.. Koing hapless Golota.. Grant.. Ruddock. b OTHA.. mORRISON.. Rahman.. Those guys are so much more superior than the names on Klitschko's KO LIST? cOME on let's keep it real here... his best stoppage win is when he actually lost vs Vitali. Life & DEATH WITH eVANDER & Mercer for 36 rds.. koing someone who impersonated the baddest man on the planet.. never having faced Rid**** Bowe Or Wladimir Klitschko & essentially winning his first title out of a garbage bin.
Your honor i rest my case once again as the baddest writer with the most lethal case of truth serum on these boxing forums!Comment
-
At least he made an effort to go & fight him.. going through training camp & paying for sparring partners while rescheduling the bout numerous times before succumbing to injury & trust me when I TELL you the beating he would've put on RAHMAN if he were fully healthy for flatout calling him a chicken would've landed Hasim in a hospital sucking through straws.... Vitali lets his brother beat up the guys he would be convicted for manslaughter against if he had fought them. Byrd..... Rahman & recently David HAYE all ESCAPED with there health intact by facing the wrath of the little bro instead of going into the lions den with a Vitali WHO CLEARLY wants to take there heads off.. consider all 3 fighters lucky. At least Vitali went & retrieved it in his VERY next training camp.
It's as clear as day that the ONLY way Vitali loses a title defense is when he gets injured & literally hands it the phock over to you on a platter.... that is what i mean!Comment
-
2 common opponents that Lewis & Vitali just faced once... These two were titlists... Let's examine shall we how Lewis & Vitali both fared against Rahman & Byrd..... tell me guys honestly who has the better resume vs both respectable titlists?
Vitali vs prime Byrd = 9 completed rds.. giving title away on a platter claiming injury
Lewis vs past prime Byrd = 0 completed rds.. giving title away on a platter claiming BYRD is inferior to him.
Vitali vs Rahman = giving title away on a platter after pretending to go through 3 or 4 training camps with no intent of actually fighting him... giving up millions of dollars in the process.. including training expenses & then coming back four yrs later.. making sure Hasim is ktfo by someone else & the coast is clear so he can beat the crap out of the fighter that beat the crap out of the fighter who knocked Rahman THE phock out for the second time in his career.
LL vs Rahman = gives title away on a platter when fine china gets shattered once again by one punch
LL vs RAHMAN II - gets title back as Hasim gave his title back to LL on a platter & ESSENTIALLY traded knockouts with him.. well we can't REALLY call it a fair exchange as Lennox had to utilyze two punches to get it done instead of the one shot it took on him.
Now i ask the board.. who was more efficient overall vs both fighters.. as essentially the end results turned out to be equivalent... they both gave away the titles they had twice (both got stripped once for NOT facing one of the fighters) & both retrieved one of the titles they gave away in there very next bout.
Who should be more ashamed? OF THERE PERFOR MANCES vs both said fighters? The fighter who gave away his belts due to tending to his medical reports or the guy who gave away his belt by being brutally ktfo because he was too busy posing with the other guys little bro & later on giving away his belt because he didn't even want to go through the embarassment of even attempting to play cat & mouse with Chris Byrd.. QUITTING without even fighting him withOUT an injury in sight?
What's better since we're talking resume.. giving your titles away three separate times so as to not face the fighter that is mandated to fight you or doing it just once because you suffered numerous injuries training for that particular fighter.
Vitali's resume is superior to Lennox's in nearly all aspects of the game. I've MORE than proven this on these last several threads... I suggest you all get your notes out. This is how i conduct a real & thorough resume & not the boll**** kind that you all do.. who's he beat.. who's he fought.. look at the state of his face.. look at the stool marks he left..... those are all juvenile opinionated bullsheet that would ONLY hOLD WATER on boxing forums.. they'd never hold water in a real courtroom if one were to look at both LL"S & vk's resume realistically.
It's as if all you haters are on the jury & have been paid off.. despite NOT even looking at evidence but forming an uneducated & completely biased opinion & yes i'm biased ALSO bUT i'm biased on the side of justice... you're biased because you could care less whether justice is served.. IN ALL YOUR MINDS the brother's are guilty & a fair trial or hung jury is nowhere in there future. they're both being accused of non greatness when they both can make a case that they've been as dominant as any heavyweight that's ever been in terms of how they've beaten the opposition.. first by administering the sweet science & then administering the knockout blow.Last edited by jimmy1569; 01-25-2012, 03:35 AM.Comment
-
Someone here obviously doesn't understand that Lewis was stripped of his IBF title for not fighting Byrd because he was fulfilling his WBC obligation against the more dangerous, lucrative and anticipated Fight with Tyson.Comment
-
There would have been ways around it. Vitali was supposed to face Juan Carlos Gómez and Maskaev both in 120 days by the WBC, he complained at the CAS and didn't need to fight Maskaev. Wlad gets away with defending all his titles only 1-2 times a year without being stripped. If LL would've wanted to face Byrd, he would've found a way, no doubt.Comment
-
The brothers are two different fighters with two different styles. Wlad beating Byrd does not avenge Vitaly's defeat. And there was no call or money in the first fight but Vitaly fought him anyway and lost. He should have WANTED to avenge that defeat like a true champion.Comment
Tweet
Comment