Comments Thread For: Arum on Pacquiao's Opponent, Mayweather's 50-50 Stance

[BIGPOPPAPUMP]

There wouldn't be any law suit from it so that's pretty inaccurate. Nearly impossible to sue a news agency.

You can sue if the comments are fabricated and the news agency refuses to make a retraction. News agencies and newspapers get sued all of the time.

[jrosales13]

oh, it definitely was part of the conversation.some of the things arum is saying now was part of the conversation then.

Bro, I'm pretty sure that having the fight at "UNLV football stadium" on the "strip of Las Vegas" was said

[jrosales13]

You can sue if the comments are fabricated and the news agency refuses to make a retraction. News agencies and newspapers get sued all of the time.

I don't remember Atlas or Smith making a retraction. But, maybe I don't remember and they did.

[sirron000]

What about that, is that a fact?

It also states in Iole article that FMJ's attorneys argument to the court to fight on May 5th was for contracted obligations to venue and cable networks. And asked for 3 weeks to recuperate from the May 5th fight thats were the June 1 surrender date comes from.

[MrRolltide91]

Pac recently said that the fans will be "happy" with his next opponent choice.

Which leads me to believe now that its NOT Miguel Cotto

the only other opponent that would make *******s happy is Bradley, if not Mayweather

When he say that?

[sirron000]

You can sue if the comments are fabricated and the news agency refuses to make a retraction. News agencies and newspapers get sued all of the time.

Yeah ask Rupert Murdoch.

[jrosales13]

It also states in Iole article that FMJ's attorneys argument to the court to fight on May 5th was for contracted obligations to venue and cable networks. And asked for 3 weeks to recuperate from the May 5th fight thats were the June 1 surrender date comes from.

I doubt that there are any contractual obligations. But, are there any legal obligations to fight on that date?

Meh...it doesn't matter anyways, since there's absolutely nothing wrong with the May 5th date. That's when the fight should take place.

[Kagami Taiga]

You can sue if the comments are fabricated and the news agency refuses to make a retraction. News agencies and newspapers get sued all of the time.

Yea and how many are successful? Its a matter of proving ESPN knew the email was fabricated which isn't easy like I said, ESPN isn't worried about getting sued. They've done similar stuff on numerous occasions. In fact I'd say they are rather known for it.

[sirron000]

The ones in red are false[Their is no proof floyd said any of that]
also, that list is small

If you keep posting facts you're going to run off the Pac****s..

[V.WEBB]

I doubt that there are any contractual obligations. But, are there any legal obligations to fight on that date?

Meh...it doesn't matter anyways, since there's absolutely nothing wrong with the May 5th date. That's when the fight should take place.

His attorney told this site that he has agreement with the court to fight on May 5.