Comments Thread For: Lamont Peterson Feels Pacquiao-Bradley is a Real Fight

Collapse
Collapse
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • bojangles1987
    bo jungle
    Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
    • Jul 2009
    • 41118
    • 1,326
    • 357
    • 63,028

    #71
    Originally posted by Bushbaby
    Well for 1 thing, we're not discussing Bradley. We're discussing your completely ludicrus statement that Petersons highly controversial win over Khan is better than Ortiz's over Berto, which it isn't.

    However if we were discussing who's the best concerning Bradley, Khan & Ortiz, I'd say Bradley is better than both & Khan is the better 140lber than Ortiz & Ortiz is obviously the better welterweight than Khan.
    I don't see how it is highly controversial. Khan was repeatedly warned, and lost two points because he didn't listen. Peterson earned that win, and deserved it. The 115-110 card for Khan was highly controversial.

    Comment

    • Bushbaby
      Wild Apache
      Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
      • Dec 2008
      • 23513
      • 727
      • 370
      • 32,078

      #72
      Originally posted by bojangles1987
      I don't see how it is highly controversial. Khan was repeatedly warned, and lost two points because he didn't listen. Peterson earned that win, and deserved it. The 115-110 card for Khan was highly controversial.
      Yeah, I could see how it's not controversial to you, but the fact remains that it was & is being investegated because of of it, period.

      That is more than an overwhelming reason to simply not be able to rate that win for Peterson over Ortiz's of Berto, but whatever turns your wheel homey.

      Comment

      • bojangles1987
        bo jungle
        Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
        • Jul 2009
        • 41118
        • 1,326
        • 357
        • 63,028

        #73
        Originally posted by Bushbaby
        Yeah, I could see how it's not controversial to you, but the fact remains that it was & is being investegated because of of it, period.

        That is more than an overwhelming reason to simply not be able to rate that win for Peterson over Ortiz's of Berto, but whatever turns your wheel homey.
        Always good arguing with you.

        Comment

        • RichCCFC
          46-0
          Unified Champion - 10,00-20,000 posts
          • Dec 2007
          • 12846
          • 441
          • 132
          • 22,116

          #74
          Are 98% of the posters on the first page mentally disabled?

          Comment

          • Bermuda
            potential friend
            Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
            • Jun 2011
            • 5108
            • 240
            • 13
            • 11,493

            #75
            i think this would be good fight. i could see bradley giving pacquiao a bit of problems, but i think pacquiao still wins it in the end.

            Comment

            • LeadUppercut
              Banned
              Unified Champion - 10,00-20,000 posts
              • May 2010
              • 13387
              • 305
              • 869
              • 13,720

              #76
              Originally posted by bojangles1987
              The 140 suggestion was a wish on my part. I really think Pac should drop back down to 140 if he isn't fighting Mayweather. 147 sucks, and he's a better fit a division lower.

              Peterson is a damn good fighter, who has acquitted himself better on big stages than Ortiz has. His big fight win over Khan is a better big fight win than Ortiz beating Berto IMO. He's absolutely every bit as good as Ortiz in my mind. I'd give him a better chance of beating Pac than Ortiz too. Ortiz has very little ability to box, very bad defense, and is very ****** in the ring. Peterson is tough, both physically and mentally, he is a very versatile boxer, and he has pretty good timing to counter speed. He's the type of fighter us Pac fans need to see him beat convincingly.
              "His big fight win over Khan is a better big fight win than Ortiz beating Berto IMO"

              I completely disagree. And we are talking about a head-to-head matchup here, styles make fights, but Khan wouldn't beat Berto. Also, there is a little thing separating them called a weight division, Ortiz was killing himself to make 140, and is clearly a much better fighter at welter. He is also proven at that weight, whereas Peterson is not.

              Spin it how you like, but.....

              FACT: Pacquiao blatantly ducked Ortiz, end of story.

              What, the third best welter on the planet is less deserving than a guy who is likely the 3rd/4th best JWW?

              GTFOH.

              Comment

              • LeadUppercut
                Banned
                Unified Champion - 10,00-20,000 posts
                • May 2010
                • 13387
                • 305
                • 869
                • 13,720

                #77
                Originally posted by bojangles1987
                I don't see how it is highly controversial. Khan was repeatedly warned, and lost two points because he didn't listen. Peterson earned that win, and deserved it. The 115-110 card for Khan was highly controversial.
                Khan will beat Peterson in a rematch dude, I am more than happy to bet on that.

                Comment

                • Mr. Philadel
                  #215Boxing
                  Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
                  • Feb 2008
                  • 20893
                  • 1,071
                  • 1,413
                  • 35,332

                  #78
                  Originally posted by BIGPOPPAPUMP
                  Recently-crowned WBA/IBF junior welterweight champion Lamont Peterson recently shared with me his thoughts on his incredible upset over Amir Khan earlier this month and what the future may hold for him.

                  [Click Here To Read More]
                  I would like to see this fight....but I doubt we'll see Floyd fight Manny afterwards if things play out the way I think they will in this fight.....just sayin

                  Comment

                  • LeadUppercut
                    Banned
                    Unified Champion - 10,00-20,000 posts
                    • May 2010
                    • 13387
                    • 305
                    • 869
                    • 13,720

                    #79
                    Originally posted by LeadUppercut
                    "His big fight win over Khan is a better big fight win than Ortiz beating Berto IMO"

                    I completely disagree. And we are talking about a head-to-head matchup here, styles make fights, but Khan wouldn't beat Berto. Also, there is a little thing separating them called a weight division, Ortiz was killing himself to make 140, and is clearly a much better fighter at welter. He is also proven at that weight, whereas Peterson is not.

                    Spin it how you like, but.....

                    FACT: Pacquiao blatantly ducked Ortiz, end of story.

                    What, the third best welter on the planet is less deserving than a guy who is likely the 3rd/4th best JWW?

                    GTFOH.
                    I made a mistake with the quote in bold.

                    The decision that Manny made was not about being " deserving ", it was about being qualified.

                    According to Pacquiao..... Ortiz is not qualified, but Peterson is.....

                    That is a blatant duck, end of story.

                    Comment

                    • Rome-By-Ko
                      The winner Is
                      Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
                      • Mar 2009
                      • 20157
                      • 323
                      • 332
                      • 29,833

                      #80
                      Originally posted by Bushbaby
                      Yeah, I could see how it's not controversial to you, but the fact remains that it was & is being investegated because of of it, period.

                      That is more than an overwhelming reason to simply not be able to rate that win for Peterson over Ortiz's of Berto, but whatever turns your wheel homey.
                      GBP's crying is what got this(so-called)investigation,not that it's any real weight to it..It's just to get the cry baby's a lil something so that they(GBP)can finally stop their moaning...Peterson beat Khan(or Khan beat himself however you wanna look at it),by no means was there anything controversial about it..

                      Khan beats Berto's no foot movement having azz as well,Khan is a bad match up for Berto imo...

                      Comment

                      Working...
                      TOP