i think Bradley would confuse the hell out of Bradley. Bradley always looks like his on a mission in his fights. i think it would be competitive, i said ages ago bradley beats pac, so im gonna stick with it.
Comments Thread For: Lamont Peterson Feels Pacquiao-Bradley is a Real Fight
Collapse
-
If Floyd keep running against Pacquiao then Bradley vs Pacquiao bring it on!
Marquez > Bradley = average defense, no power, weak chin, can't counterpunch like Marquez.Comment
-
Wow, really?? I mean really?? So a 40 year old HOF fighter that hasn't won in almost 2 years means nothing??No matter how ya wanna slice it bro,Marga's is a proven fighter(against other to level opposition)and Mosley is an HOF fighter..Ortiz is a guy who just a yr or two ago quit against an obvious limited fighter,and a fighter who was never ranked highly at 140lb despite having a load of advantages at the weight...
Let's also not forget Berto wanted nothing to do with Mosley...
Or Margarito a proven fighter?? What did he do after being caught & loading up his gloves?? I'll be here.
Ortiz may not have been ranked highly at 140 like you say, whatever, He beat the 2nd ranked welterweight & became that. A welterweight champion that Pacman never faced btw.Comment
-
Bradley for Pac would be high risk, low reward....Bradley's one my favorite fighters but I genuinely think you need to be a pure counterpuncher to give Pac problems.. That doesn't mean Bradley couldn't beat em because--by all indications--he would be the much hungrier fighter.. But I think Pac's wierd angles, hand speed, from the southpaw stance would probably be too much for Bradley. Plus, Bradley Brawls too much and that's not something you want to do against Pac..Comment
-
Your missing the point,neither Berto or Ortiz had a significant win bro..Ortiz biggest win was against Berto,what the hell was Berto's biggest win??You see,if ya look to either Marga's Mosley or Cotto they are all very accomplished fighters..No matter the age or whatever ya wanna talk about,they will be looked at as better wins(and tbh they should be looked at as better wins)...Ortiz fought to a draw with Peterson(and imo lost to Peterson)he had no business in the ring with Mayweather..Wow, really?? I mean really?? So a 40 year old HOF fighter that hasn't won in almost 2 years means nothing??
Or Margarito a proven fighter?? What did he do after being caught & loading up his gloves?? I'll be here.
Ortiz may not have been ranked highly at 140 like you say, whatever, He beat the 2nd ranked welterweight & became that. A welterweight champion that Pacman never faced btw.Comment
-
If this is how you feel, there is no need for debate. Take a cripple HOFmer toss him in there with the pfp #1 and praise him fo looking like hot garbage against a shot fighter, yeah, we're done here.Your missing the point,neither Berto or Ortiz had a significant win bro..Ortiz biggest win was against Berto,what the hell was Berto's biggest win??You see,if ya look to either Marga's Mosley or Cotto they are all very accomplished fighters..No matter the age or whatever ya wanna talk about,they will be looked at as better wins(and tbh they should be looked at as better wins)...Ortiz fought to a draw with Peterson(and imo lost to Peterson)he had no business in the ring with Mayweather..Comment
Comment