Comments Thread For: Lamont Peterson Feels Pacquiao-Bradley is a Real Fight

Collapse
Collapse
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • Bushbaby
    Wild Apache
    Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
    • Dec 2008
    • 23513
    • 727
    • 370
    • 32,078

    #81
    Originally posted by Rome-By-Ko
    GBP's crying is what got this(so-called)investigation,not that it's any real weight to it..It's just to get the cry baby's a lil something so that they(GBP)can finally stop their moaning...Peterson beat Khan(or Khan beat himself however you wanna look at it),by no means was there anything controversial about it..

    Khan beats Berto's no foot movement having azz as well,Khan is a bad match up for Berto imo...
    Yeah ok Rome, I already see where your head is. But getting points deducting for pushing, pushing in Peterson's backyard does raise eyebrows. I'm actually glad that Peterson won, but it was controversial.

    On the other note, I find it simply hilarious that ya'll tend to ignore Khan's glearing flaws, in favor of speaking on another man who's bigger, almost as quick has more power & a better chin, but to each his own. Both have ****ty stamina BTW.

    Comment

    • Rome-By-Ko
      The winner Is
      Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
      • Mar 2009
      • 20157
      • 323
      • 332
      • 29,833

      #82
      Originally posted by Bushbaby
      Yeah ok Rome, I already see where your head is. But getting points deducting for pushing, pushing in Peterson's backyard does raise eyebrows. I'm actually glad that Peterson won, but it was controversial.

      On the other note, I find it simply hilarious that ya'll tend to ignore Khan's glearing flaws, in favor of speaking on another man who's bigger, almost as quick has more power & a better chin, but to each his own. Both have ****ty stamina BTW.
      I think Khan has better stamina then Berto,I never over looked Khan's flaws..But let's be honest,Berto is far more flawed then Khan..I also think Khan has been taking the better punch..I'm not trying to pump rainbows up Khan's azz by any means..But from what I see from both.I'd definitely pick Khan to beat Berto,let's see if Berto improves anything against Ortiz..If he does not,expect another one-sided beat down..

      BTW that's my biggest problem with fighters like Berto and Alexander..All the talent in the world with no work ethic..Say what ya will about Khan's flaws,but you can not knock his work ethic,imo it's why I would pick him over Berto or Ortiz..Whom neither have really improved,while Khan at least looks as if he is trying to work out the holes in his game...

      Comment

      • bojangles1987
        bo jungle
        Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
        • Jul 2009
        • 41118
        • 1,326
        • 357
        • 63,028

        #83
        Originally posted by LeadUppercut
        Khan will beat Peterson in a rematch dude, I am more than happy to bet on that.
        Maybe, and it wouldn't exactly surprise me. If he had just made a few adjustments, he would have easily won enough clear rounds to pull the decision the first time around. Doesn't change what happened the first time.

        Comment

        • Bushbaby
          Wild Apache
          Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
          • Dec 2008
          • 23513
          • 727
          • 370
          • 32,078

          #84
          Originally posted by Rome-By-Ko
          I think Khan has better stamina then Berto,I never over looked Khan's flaws..But let's be honest,Berto is far more flawed then Khan..I also think Khan has been taking the better punch..I'm not trying to pump rainbows up Khan's azz by any means..But from what I see from both.I'd definitely pick Khan to beat Berto,let's see if Berto improves anything against Ortiz..If he does not,expect another one-sided beat down..

          BTW that's my biggest problem with fighters like Berto and Alexander..All the talent in the world with no work ethic..Say what ya will about Khan's flaws,but you can not knock his work ethic,imo it's why I would pick him over Berto or Ortiz..Whom neither have really improved,while Khan at least looks as if he is trying to work out the holes in his game...
          Just by you calling the 1st a fight a one sided beat down says it all. I'd absolutely love to know how you came to believe Khan takes a better punch. Anyway, we'll see how Khan handles that weterweight strenght & power soon enough. Bet your a$$ I'll be right here waiting to say I told you so!!

          Comment

          • Rome-By-Ko
            The winner Is
            Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
            • Mar 2009
            • 20157
            • 323
            • 332
            • 29,833

            #85
            Originally posted by Bushbaby
            Just by you calling the 1st a fight a one sided beat down says it all. I'd absolutely love to know how you came to believe Khan takes a better punch. Anyway, we'll see how Khan handles that weterweight strenght & power soon enough. Bet your a$$ I'll be right here waiting to say I told you so!!
            Other then a few moments(Berto's KD's)what else did you give Berto in that fight??Ortiz clearly dominated and if ya can't see that then I really don't know what to tell you..I don't count laying on the ropes and covering up as back and forth action...Berto's chin has always been a big problem for him imo,against Collazo he was falling(and it should have been ruled a KD)Quintana clearly hurt him..Khan was KO'd,but he has taking punches a bit better since moving up...

            Comment

            Working...
            TOP