If Floyd and Manny fight May 5th and Floyd dominates he is top 15 atg

[puga]

@ see you "lose"... quit taking this internet **** to heart puga, Jro just broke down his opinion and all you managed to do was come back with insults and a ****** triangle theory to answer his question. Go watch some boxing you fucking ****** so you can actually have a discussion without having to sound like a complete idiot.

there's 2 things that you do good...cheerleading and mowing the lawn...now, go get paid....

[$coinblatt$]

there's 2 things that you do good...cheerleading and mowing the lawn...now, go get paid....

lol there is 2 things you do good, sucking pacquiaos **** and not knowing **** about boxing

see? I can play that **** to

[puga]

If I were dying to see you lose in a discussion all I'd have to do is go read any exchange between you and any other poster from the last 24 hours. Im dying to see if its possible for you to come up with a reasonable logical rebuttal. So far, I see it not...

really?...show me one please im dying to see it...

[jrosales13]

oh god, palying it safe like usual...before we go any further, who has the better resume at ww , pac or floyd?...no neeutral ****...

I think the Cotto win for Pac and the Mosley win for Floyd is quite even. Because, of the circumstance going into both fights and how both were perceived at the time.

I would probably give the edge for Floyd over the likes of Hatton, Judah, Baldomir and Ortiz over the Clottey, Mosley and Oscar win. I strongly am for more importantly than who is when.

I think Floyd win over JMM is clearly better than Pac win over JMM

I think it's close. Before Floyd fought Ortiz I probably would have said Pac had the better resume. After that fight I would have said it was even. Because, of where Ortiz was ranked and how he looked prior. Because, again more importantly than who is when.

But, after Pac-JMM III it's Floyd IMO. I still think it's close but clearly Floyd has the better WW resume. If Pac would have dominated JMM then I probably would say Pac. But, the way he struggled against JMM while at the same time Floyd was laughing after coming an 18 month layoff or whatever it was. It's hard not to say Floyd.

I do believe Pac has the overall better resume. I think Pac is higher in the overall P4P ATG's list on mine. But, it's a lot closer for me than it was prior than the JMM fight. After that fight I had to re-evaluate Pac.

So go on....

[turbotime]

You mean Pac finally stopped ducking him and fought Shane after he saw Floyd and Mora handle him? Lol Yeah that Pacquiao, what a warrior.

Made Cotto come in at a catchweight after getting spanked by Margarito and barely beating Clottey, and he STILL needed a catchweight to fight. Pacquiao, what a warrior.

Baldomir beat Clottey, by the way.

Don't bring in Margarito, that wasn't at welterweight.

Bump for puga.

[puga]

lol there is 2 things you do good, sucking pacquiaos **** and not knowing **** about boxing

see? I can play that **** to

if i dnt know my ****, id be getting owned left and right...but even the one youre cheerleading on cant even **** with me....and there's like 6 of you mofos right now which is equl to 1/2

[Come∂ian]

really?...show me one please im dying to see it...

Look no further then this thread...EVERY point you have tried to make has been shitted on.

[CHOWWOKKA]

actually i was not....floyd only fought one of them that makes that triangle theory youre talking about...pac fought all of them...

and no, even shane admited he lost to cotto...it was a clear win ...

You are saying because Cotto beat Shane and Pac beat Cotto, a Cotto win is a better win then a Shane win. Not to mention he fought him at a catchweight, I think a Shane win after he KO a guy who has never been knockedout is a better win then Cotto who just edged a win over Clottey and Shane.

[puga]

I think the Cotto win for Pac and the Mosley win for Floyd is quite even. Because, of the circumstance going into both fights and how both were perceived at the time.

I would probably give the edge for Floyd over the likes of Hatton, Judah, Baldomir and Ortiz over the Clottey, Mosley and Oscar win. I strongly am for more importantly than who is when.

I think Floyd win over JMM is clearly better than Pac win over JMM

I think it's close. Before Floyd fought Ortiz I probably would have said Pac had the better resume. After that fight I would have said it was even. Because, of where Ortiz was ranked and how he looked prior. Because, again more importantly than who is when.

But, after Pac-JMM III it's Floyd IMO. I still think it's close but clearly Floyd has the better WW resume. If Pac would have dominated JMM then I probably would say Pac. But, the way he struggled against JMM while at the same time Floyd was laughing after coming an 18 month layoff or whatever it was. It's hard not to say Floyd.

I do believe Pac has the overall better resume. I think Pac is higher in the overall P4P ATG's list on mine. But, it's a lot closer for me than it was prior than the JMM fight. After that fight I had to re-evaluate Pac.

So go on....

ridiculous....the shane floyd beat is about even since they oth fought him not too far apart..you could say shane was a champion when floyd fought him but he was coming off a 16 month lay off....the shane that pac fought was only few months later and was not inactive.....now, there is no win on floyd that could equal to the cotto win since cotto has already beaten the way younger shane...we both know who the better fighter is between baldomir and clottey, so again , clottey win is better than the baldo win.....both the jmm wins count for nothing...

[jaestix1]

pacroid is a hypejob and i would rank floyd's win over jmm higher than a pacroid win.