If Floyd and Manny fight May 5th and Floyd dominates he is top 15 atg

[$coinblatt$]

*****tt...i defintely know more than you...

right

[jrosales13]

i know how to read between the lines based on your tone, i know exactly why youre asking how so either...so how not?....

What tone?

Anyways lets look at their wins at WW.

Floyd has-Mitchell, Judah, Baldomir, Hatton, JMM, Mosley, Ortiz

Pac has-Oscar, Cotto, Clottey, Mosley, JMM.

Of course the quantity goes to Floyd. But, you're saying the quality goes to Pac without a doubt. I will ask again how so?

I'm not questioning you picking Pac. I can see why some would pick Pac in having the better WW resume. Whether I agree with it or not I can see some sort of argument...I'm questioning though your "no doubt" comment. As if Pac clearly has the better WW resume. You're saying it's not debatable. So again how so?

[$coinblatt$]

So again how so?

how not?

[GrandpaBernard]

What tone?

Anyways lets look at their wins at WW.

Floyd has-Mitchell, Judah, Baldomir, Hatton, JMM, Mosley, Ortiz

Pac has-Oscar, Cotto, Clottey, Mosley, JMM.

Of course the quantity goes to Floyd. But, you're saying the quality goes to Pac without a doubt. I will ask again how so?

I'm not questioning you picking Pac. I can see why some would pick Pac in having the better WW resume. Whether I agree with it or not I can see some sort of argument...I'm questioning though your "no doubt" comment. As if Pac clearly has the better WW resume. You're saying it's not debatable. So again how so?

Are you purposely excluding marg because he been irrelevant as an elite fighter ever since being forced to fight legit?

[tennishero]

ducked cotto
marg
martinez

dlh was old
mosley was shot- and most of mosley's career is in doubt because of PEDs anyway
hatton was never that good

only good wins came at 130

floyd barely makes top 50
a pacquiao win would put him top 25-35

on the other hand manny's resume at 125-130 puts him top 10 ATG already
a floyd win would put him top 5
if manny beats floyd and martinez is number 1 all time

[jrosales13]

no he wouldnt be a top 15 atg !!!! he would have to beat manny , then , martinez , then cotto , and margarito !!!!!! 1 fight with manny does not take off the brussales and shamba mitchel off his resume !!!!!!

Beating Margarito now does nothing for Floyd. Absolutely nothing...In 2006-2007 it would have done something for Floyd legacy late 2008 no doubt it would have done something...Now, it would do nothing for his legacy at all.

Stop mentioning Margarito he's done. A Cotto win does nothing to very little for his legacy also.

Again one has to look more importantly than who is when.

[puga]

Yet you cant intelligently articulate your point of view to Jro......

im always 2 steps ahead with that fool , he knows it.....he can use that **** to others but not with me...

[jrosales13]

Are you purposely excluding marg because he been irrelevant as an elite fighter ever since being forced to fight legit?

For one, as far as I'm concern all Margarito fights have been legit until proven otherwise. You feel he wasn't and that's fine. I have no problem with that. You have the absolute right to feel that way.

I excluded the Margarito fight for the same reason I excluded the Oscar fight for Floyd.

The subject is WW resume...WW...Anything from 141-147. I'm not talking about what they did at 140 and below or 148 and above. Strictly WW resume.

[jrosales13]

how not?

I need to catch up cuz' he's two steps ahead

[puga]

What tone?

Anyways lets look at their wins at WW.

Floyd has-Mitchell, Judah, Baldomir, Hatton, JMM, Mosley, Ortiz

Pac has-Oscar, Cotto, Clottey, Mosley, JMM.

Of course the quantity goes to Floyd. But, you're saying the quality goes to Pac without a doubt. I will ask again how so?

I'm not questioning you picking Pac. I can see why some would pick Pac in having the better WW resume. Whether I agree with it or not I can see some sort of argument...I'm questioning though your "no doubt" comment. As if Pac clearly has the better WW resume. You're saying it's not debatable. So again how so?

ther you go, now you opened up....you read my mind ...how so?...simple..quality over qunatity....cotto is by far bigger than anthting floyd has done at ww...why?...cotto already beat shane and that is floyd's biggest win...why again?...the shane that fought floyd was not much better than the shane that floyd fought...floyd did not fight cotto at all, infact he retired to avoid him...