If Floyd and Manny fight May 5th and Floyd dominates he is top 15 atg

[puga]

I need to catch up cuz' he's two steps ahead

what, you need a cheerleader to go aganist me?...

[straightleft]

Even if Floyd beat Pac, he will still consider lower than Pacquiao. Floyd did not fight a real threat since the Castillo fight. He avoided Cotto and Margarito then fought a lightweight and light welterweight instead.

[Come∂ian]

ducked cotto
marg
martinez

dlh was old
mosley was shot- and most of mosley's career is in doubt because of PEDs anyway
hatton was never that good

only good wins came at 130

floyd barely makes top 50
a pacquiao win would put him top 25-35

on the other hand manny's resume at 125-130 puts him top 10 ATG already
a floyd win would put him top 5
if manny beats floyd and martinez is number 1 all time

go check your lawnmowers if they got gas puto, early day tommorow...

no he wouldnt be a top 15 atg !!!! he would have to beat manny , then , martinez , then cotto , and margarito !!!!!! 1 fight with manny does not take off the brussales and shamba mitchel off his resume !!!!!!

No way is he top 15 if he beats Manny.. if he had the welterweight record that Manny does then I could see it, but he doesn't. He'd have to face someone like Martinez after now.

If he takes actually stops ducking the fight and decides to sign it which I truly doubt, and he somehow manages to pull off the upset of course. I would say top 10 if not better.

Doesn't matter what Floyd does he will never be greater than PAC.

floyd mayweather is not gonna fight pacquiao, lol, hes gayy!!!!!!!!!!, lol, nyahaha

cowards cant be atg

[turbotime]

Floyd has a slight size advantage.

Floyd rarely has a size advantage over his opponents.

Certainly not 2 weight classes like that idiot puga is saying.

[puga]

you think postng gifs would get soemthing done....posting **** like that just means " you have no answer....who the hell you fooling

[GrandpaBernard]

Certainly not 2 weight classes like that idiot puga is saying.

yea puga is a troll

[turbotime]

how not?.....

Um, Floyd fought and beat the lineal welterweight titlist twice, when Pacquiao ducked and fought leftovers instead.

[jrosales13]

ther you go, now you opened up....you read my mind ...how so?...simple..quality over qunatity....cotto is by far bigger than anthting floyd has done at ww...why?...cotto already beat shane and that is floyd's biggest win...why again?...the shane that fought floyd was not much better than the shane that floyd fought...floyd did not fight cotto at all, infact he retired to avoid him...

Do you not more importantly than who is when into account?

Yes Cotto beat Mosley(we can even discuss that more if you want)

But, Mosley dominated the guy who probably took years off Cotto career.

So when you say by far...Not it's not by far.

And, even if you think that Pac win over Cotto was better than Floyd win over Mosley or even vice versa.

One win doesn't reflect on who has the better resume.

One win doesn't even reflect quality like you want to mention. Because, if Floyd has the better 2nd, 3rd, 4th, 5th wins that are better than Pac. Then how can you say that it's Pac without a doubt. I'm only asking cuz' you only gave me one win instead of really matching up their WW resume.

I tell you what rank Pac best wins at WW. And, then give me Floyd top 5 best wins at WW(since Pac only has 5 fights, while Floyd has 7). And, then match them up and tell me why Pac WW resume is no doubt better.

[Come∂ian]

you think postng gifs would get soemthing done....posting **** like that just means " you have no answer....who the hell you fooling

hahaha instead of posting Gifs from now on I should just post "How Not?" to really explain my point of view.

[puga]

Um, Floyd fought and beat the lineal welterweight titlist twice, when Pacquiao ducked and fought leftovers instead.

yeah , one was a lineal bum and the other was someone who wanted to quit vs pac....lol