Question? If Floyd had problems with Zab Judah, why not Pac

[BuckToothed]

and by the way, at 140, manny gets eaten for a late night snack by tszyu. i like manny alot but im starting to think hes takin the list for being top over rated fighter

You mean how Tszyu ate Hatton for a late night snack, and choked for RTD11 instead?
The same Hatton that got KO2 by Manny?
I'm not one to use triangle theories, but since Tszyu is long retired, we can only go by common opponent for this fantasy fight.

[D4thincarnation]

What percentage of his power shots has he landed in his 3 fights with Marquez? Rhetorical question.

vs Marquez 3: 43%

vs Marquez 2: 37%

vs Marquez 1: 43%

[slc7108]

Wow

95 Zab could box Manny does not box he throws allot of punches and has really no boxing skill. Floyd has way more reach advantage and Manny is simply to small for a counter puncher that hits harfer than Marquez, Manny been in to many wars and its starting to show! Clottley who barely threw punches marked him up bad and he looked destroyed against Marquez!

[treason1]

and manny is mentally stronger than zab ever was !!!!!!! mayweather is in for a serious battle if he ever mans up and fight s manny !!!!!!!

[Reloaded]

You mean how Tszyu ate Hatton for a late night snack, and choked for RTD11 instead?
The same Hatton that got KO2 by Manny?
I'm not one to use triangle theories, but since Tszyu is long retired, we can only go by common opponent for this fantasy fight.

Here is a beginners problem right in your post ,

IT WAS NOT THE SAME HATTON THAT PAC BEAT .

[thatnickuh]

vs Marquez 3: 43%

vs Marquez 2: 37%

vs Marquez 1: 43%

I said that the question was rhetorical because I already knew that it was below half. The point being that Pacquiao is able to land a half of his power shots against guys who stand right in front of him with little to no movement for the most part. When faced with someone who can move and can use angles his percentage drops. Pacquiao is not an accurate pin-point puncher he's a volume puncher, and that's the point that the poster that you quoted was making. Your comment was basically irrelevant to his point.

[D4thincarnation]

I said that the question was rhetorical because I already knew that it was below half. The point being that Pacquiao is able to land a half of his power shots against guys who stand right in front of him with little to no movement for the most part. When faced with someone who can move and can use angles his percentage drops. Pacquiao is not an accurate pin-point puncher he's a volume puncher, and that's the point that the poster that you quoted was making. Your comment was basically irrelevant to his point.

41% is bad now, and Cotto, Mosley ran for most of the fight and Clottey just came to defend.

My post was a response to someon who said Pacquiao's accuracy is horrible, it is clearly is not, is is one of the best infact and it against top opposition.

[solo20]

why feed the trolls zab and pac fight nothing alike the size,skills and reach are diffrent

[thatnickuh]

41% is bad now, and Cotto, Mosley ran for most of the fight and Clottey just came to defend.

My post was a response to someon who said Pacquiao's accuracy is horrible, it is clearly is not, is is one of the best infact and it against top opposition.

I didn't say that his percentage was bad, I didn't say what his percentage was. I'm not 1 of these guys that take compubox punch stats as the Gospel. When I speak it's on the strength of what I've seen with my own eyes. Watching Pacquiao in his 3 fights with Marquez, he misses a lot and misses badly a lot. At times, Cotto had Pacquiao missing badly and looking wild. Enough with this "run" nonsense, it's called boxing. I just don't undersand why socalled boxing fans have such little appreciation for the actual art of boxing.

[The Big Dunn]

I didn't say that his percentage was bad, I didn't say what his percentage was. I'm not 1 of these guys that take compubox punch stats as the Gospel. When I speak it's on the strength of what I've seen with my own eyes. Watching Pacquiao in his 3 fights with Marquez, he misses a lot and misses badly a lot. At times, Cotto had Pacquiao missing badly and looking wild. Enough with this "run" nonsense, it's called boxing. I just don't undersand why socalled boxing fans have such little appreciation for the actual art of boxing.

Because they only like Manny, sorta like people only liking Tyson in the 80's. They want to see the brutal KO, not boxing. They dont want to hear about reach, and balance, timing. Just, wow he KTFO dude.