* Why the hell are people bringing up all these little details about ducking a Sergio fight? 150 no 147 no 154. How is Pac ducking when the JMM fight has been agreed upon since June. If Sergio forces his own path by taking on the cream of the crop @ middleweight or jr middle and stops trying to piggy back off Floyd or Pac than he could eventually lure a big fight. But, crying and quoting to the media every day is only hurting his chances.
FACT: Pacquiao wanted to fight for Sergio's title, just not against Sergio
" I will fight anyone at 150 " ~ MP
" I can make 150, and will fight you in 2012 " ~ SM
" I will fight you at 147 " ~ MP
Now, you can call that whatever you like, you fkn genius, but I got two words... DUCKING B1TCH !!
* Why couldn't the Floyd fight been made in the first infamous negotiation 2 years ago and under standard drug testing that...(drumroll please) EVERY OTHER BOXER USES? Dumb ****s like you probably never heard of OST before Floyd played his hand but hold Pac to a higher drug testing standard. Did you honestly think Pac was juicing before the Floyd debacle? I bet no.
Yes, I did, I thought that it was HIGHLY SU****IOUS that after looking like he was "faded", "slipping", and "been in too many wars" during the Marquez fight (Emmanuel Steward)..... Pacquiao suddenly gained 13lbs of muscle in 9 months while ripping through 3 divisions simultaneously increasing his speed and power..... and (coincidentally) he will not agree to undertake random blood tests.
Anyway, WHO FKN CARES DUDE ?
FACT: blood tests are completely harmless
FACT: Pacquiao's 8 ridiculous excuses are absurd
FACT: there is NO genuine reason to avoid random blood tests
Just more pac-dribble, and more absurd excuses as to why a supposed P4P fighter will not step up to the plate
Let's try a change of pace Mr. Traditional greatness. Can you produce an expert "grocery list" on how Floyd is so great? Please explain how he cleaned out 135, 140 or 147. Explain how he beat "prime" versions of De La Hoya and Mosley. Explain how Judah and Baldo were great wins, let's hear it.
Nah, lets not do that pointless exercise.
1.) this is about Pacquiao, not Mayweather
2.) how would Mayweathers actions excuse or justify Pacquiao's?
3.) I dont give a *** about Mayweather, you can say what you like
Well, Mr " excuse-machine "..... so your job is to justify Pacquiao's cherry-picking behavior and his failure to step up to the plate and fight a live dog huh..... ?
FAIL !!
FACT: Pacquiao wanted to fight for Sergio's title, just not against Sergio
" I will fight anyone at 150 " ~ MP
" I can make 150, and will fight you in 2012 " ~ SM
" I will fight you at 147 " ~ MP
Now, you can call that whatever you like, you fkn genius, but I got two words... DUCKING B1TCH !!
* Why couldn't the Floyd fight been made in the first infamous negotiation 2 years ago and under standard drug testing that...(drumroll please) EVERY OTHER BOXER USES? Dumb ****s like you probably never heard of OST before Floyd played his hand but hold Pac to a higher drug testing standard. Did you honestly think Pac was juicing before the Floyd debacle? I bet no.
Yes, I did, I thought that it was HIGHLY SU****IOUS that after looking like he was "faded", "slipping", and "been in too many wars" during the Marquez fight (Emmanuel Steward)..... Pacquiao suddenly gained 13lbs of muscle in 9 months while ripping through 3 divisions simultaneously increasing his speed and power..... and (coincidentally) he will not agree to undertake random blood tests.
Anyway, WHO FKN CARES DUDE ?
FACT: blood tests are completely harmless
FACT: Pacquiao's 8 ridiculous excuses are absurd
FACT: there is NO genuine reason to avoid random blood tests
Just more pac-dribble, and more absurd excuses as to why a supposed P4P fighter will not step up to the plate
Let's try a change of pace Mr. Traditional greatness. Can you produce an expert "grocery list" on how Floyd is so great? Please explain how he cleaned out 135, 140 or 147. Explain how he beat "prime" versions of De La Hoya and Mosley. Explain how Judah and Baldo were great wins, let's hear it.
Nah, lets not do that pointless exercise.
1.) this is about Pacquiao, not Mayweather
2.) how would Mayweathers actions excuse or justify Pacquiao's?
3.) I dont give a *** about Mayweather, you can say what you like
Well, Mr " excuse-machine "..... so your job is to justify Pacquiao's cherry-picking behavior and his failure to step up to the plate and fight a live dog huh..... ?
FAIL !!
Comment