Pacquiao/Marquez - a TRUE "old school" fight (same day weigh-in)

Collapse
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • keehlnate
    Banned
    Silver Champion - 100-500 posts
    • Oct 2011
    • 209
    • 24
    • 1
    • 297

    #21
    have you forgotten that Marquez is coming off from a round 1 KO victory? He might kill Pacquiao ROFL

    Comment

    • V.WEBB
      CBVM
      Unified Champion - 10,00-20,000 posts
      • Dec 2009
      • 14327
      • 621
      • 174
      • 21,453

      #22
      Originally posted by Deevel916
      Why werent the Pac haters complaining about Margarito or Clottey when they both had around a 15lb weight advantage on Pac? Where were the cries for injustice there?
      Are you serious? As the days go by, you say the silliest things. Margarito and Clottey?

      Cut it out.

      Comment

      • RubenSonny
        Lagos State of Mind
        Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
        • Mar 2010
        • 4747
        • 287
        • 388
        • 11,330

        #23
        Originally posted by Bushbaby
        Might as well disregard weight classes period, concerning Pacman. Funny thing is that its weight that has been a deciding factor in all but 2 fights over 140. Yet his fans toss that to the side.
        Are you suggesting that Cotto and Margarito lost due to the weight?

        Comment

        • RubenSonny
          Lagos State of Mind
          Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
          • Mar 2010
          • 4747
          • 287
          • 388
          • 11,330

          #24
          So this fight is in Philly?

          Comment

          • WARQUEZ
            World Class™
            Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
            • Sep 2011
            • 4275
            • 296
            • 213
            • 12,259

            #25
            Originally posted by CONQUERING
            Are you serious? As the days go by, you say the silliest things. Margarito and Clottey?

            Cut it out.
            Is he a troll or just plain ******? I can't tell. He says some of the weirdest things like "They are both the same size". How can a natural lightweight be the same size as a man who has built himself up as a JWW/WW for 3 years? Is he another one of those hugh grants?

            Comment

            • Bushbaby
              Wild Apache
              Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
              • Dec 2008
              • 23513
              • 727
              • 370
              • 32,078

              #26
              Originally posted by RubenSonny
              Are you suggesting that Cotto and Margarito lost due to the weight?
              Nope, I'm simply saying that all fights above 140 except for 2 had weight as one of the deciding factors, period. With that said you're free to believe whatever you like about the meaning.

              Comment

              • Russian Crushin
                atheist with a gun
                Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
                • Dec 2009
                • 33788
                • 1,471
                • 836
                • 46,625

                #27
                Originally posted by Bushbaby
                Nope, I'm simply saying that all fights above 140 except for 2 had weight as one of the deciding factors, period. With that said you're free to believe whatever you like about the meaning.
                Deciding Factor: "the most important factor which influences a decision''

                You cant have more then one deciding factor

                So you're saying the weight won the fight for Pac

                Comment

                • johnm is...
                  ****in *** Broads
                  Unified Champion - 10,00-20,000 posts
                  • Oct 2005
                  • 10700
                  • 820
                  • 1,382
                  • 48,813

                  #28
                  Originally posted by uglypug
                  everybody knows there is a difference between "age" and "boxing age". . . Pacquiao and Marquez are both the same in regards to "boxing age". . .
                  Sig worthy shit, right here.

                  Comment

                  • PACnPBFsuck
                    Not wearing Nikes
                    Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
                    • Jul 2010
                    • 22215
                    • 1,974
                    • 1,465
                    • 265,934

                    #29
                    Originally posted by uglypug
                    He straight SCHOOLED Katsidis

                    Comment

                    • waxfondler
                      Undisputed Champion
                      • Mar 2010
                      • 1438
                      • 57
                      • 3
                      • 7,609

                      #30
                      Originally posted by -Lowkey-
                      I’m not a Pac fan or hater but I complained about both fights, both fighters coming off recent losses and in the case of the Marg fight fighting for a vacant 154lbs belt at a 150 catch weight despite not even being ranked at that weight coming back from a ban and looking like **** against a nobody on his return.
                      definitely agree clottey & margs didnt deserve the fight. but to put things in perspective:

                      • clottey lost to cotto, but many felt that it was very close. and clottey was a ranked WW at the time i believe... noteworthy WW above clottey were: berto, shane, cotto... and pac handled 2 of 3 of those guys... and pac wouldve demolished berto for his '0'.
                      • margs was considerably bigger than pac (but not much of a power puncher)... margs is a dangerous fighter for anyone. pressure fighters with a granite chin is NOT an easy fight for anyone. and if you want to get technical, margs was coming off a win (no matter how shít he looked. LOL).

                      i agree it was complete BS for the CW 150 fight to be for the 154 title. there was alot wrong with that fight. the only saving grace was the "slaying of a cheater" for the sadistic types. some people enjoyed seeing margs "get what he deserved".
                      Last edited by waxfondler; 10-31-2011, 09:13 AM.

                      Comment

                      Working...
                      TOP