everybody knows there is a difference between "age" and "boxing age". . . Pacquiao and Marquez are both the same in regards to "boxing age". . .
Marquez has shown BETTER STAMINA than he ever has before!
IF he's a natural lightweight, than so is manny, because last time I chekced, they both walk around at the SAME WEIGHT! they both rehydrate TO THE SAME WEIGHT!
FINALLY, we get a fight where BOTH FIGHTERS will be able to come in at their very best, without having to cut any weight! OLD SCHOOL!
what a ****** fuuucking *******
both are warriors and they both have the exact same number of fights.... but on fight night the pacman will only be 32... while jmm is and will be 38!!!!
GO FUUCK YOURSELF!!!!!
Last edited by LatinKing416; 10-31-2011, 09:39 AM.
how did he not school him? he landed 100 more punches. . . TWICE the connect percentage, and TKO'd him? He got knocked down once, but got right back up and almost stopped katsidis in that round. . .
Mayweather schooled Marquez, Pac schooled Margarito, Marquez at no point schooled Katsidis.
You obviously didn't watch the fight, you just found out the punch stats and came on here with this nonsense.
Katsidis was walking towards Marquez wrecklessly not respecting his power the entire fight, that's the only reason why his punchstats are better. Katsidis was only looking for a 1 punch KO.
Marquez beat Katsidis, but to come in here and say he schooled him, it's pretty ****** comment.
uhh. . pac weighs 148 on fightnight. . . marquez weighs 148 on fightnight. .
how is one bigger than the other? the only difference between marquez and pac is that marquez CUTS MAD WEIGHT! to fight at lightweight, while pac doesn't cut weight and fights at his normal weight. . .
Martinez was 165 on fight night against Barker, Ortiz was 164 on fight night against Floyd? How is one bigger than the other?
Yes....Because EVERYONE who watched that find was half blind and couldnt help to notice that Floyd had quite a signifigant size advantage on JMM.
dude u are a horrible poster. just shut up. its always funny to hear how ppl explain why they shat on floyd fighting marquez but how its a legit fight 2 yrs and a few wars later for pac.
dude u are a horrible poster. just shut up. its always funny to hear how ppl explain why they shat on floyd fighting marquez but how its a legit fight 2 yrs and a few wars later for pac.
It's funny to see all of this unfold, but it's nothing new.
Might as well disregard weight classes period, concerning Pacman. Funny thing is that its weight that has been a deciding factor in all but 2 fights over 140. Yet his fans toss that to the side.
Clearly you don't know what the phrase deciding factor means.
As we all know you can’t accurately gauge a fighters ‘boxing age’ this is just nonsense and nothing more than your opinion. I know it is highly unlikely for a 38 year old with 59 pro fights and a good number of gruelling wars to still be in his ‘Prime boxing age’.
The fact is Marquez is 38 years old fighter has shown signs of wear and tear in recent fights he is in my opinion battle worn and has been in steady decline for a number of years.
You can keep up this agenda as much as you want but you are never going to convince anyone that this fight is anything but a mismatch happening at the wrong weight and 3 years to late.
Exactly which signs of wear and tear are you referring to?
Comment