Better Legacy, Bernard Hopkins or Wladmir Klitschko?

Collapse
Collapse
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • Mr. Invincible
    Banned
    Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
    • Jan 2010
    • 2938
    • 77
    • 65
    • 3,147

    #91
    Originally posted by Dirk Diggler UK
    Slow, no defence, no footwork, no real power either. He isnt that big either.
    That's cool, I tend to disagree but as you know I've decided to open your post to read it because you were blocked. My question is, do you just see my posts and deliberately just play devils advocate on anything I say or is this really how you feel? I kind of find it hard to believe that we absolutely have opposing opinions on anything involving boxing.

    Comment

    • Marshall89
      Banned
      Silver Champion - 100-500 posts
      • Sep 2011
      • 358
      • 20
      • 40
      • 475

      #92
      It's between Bernard or Vitali, Wlad can't touch them!!!
      B-Hop has fought some top fighters like Trinidad, Jones Jnr, Calzaghe etc...
      Vitali has fought better opposition than Wlad has!!! And Vitali doesn't drop off a jab and stands there and trades, unlike Wlad!

      Comment

      • Roy Jones Jnr
        Undisputed Champion
        Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
        • Oct 2011
        • 5123
        • 253
        • 276
        • 23,034

        #93
        The Eksaycushanar

        Comment

        • hogey
          Contender
          Silver Champion - 100-500 posts
          • Dec 2007
          • 455
          • 67
          • 61
          • 10,992

          #94
          Hopkins by a mile he is a different league in career terms from Wlad, when you look at the total mugs that have battered Wlad into defeat i think its almost insulting to Hopkins to even ask the question. Wlad is a B level fighter dominating a division of C and D level opponents, thats except for his brother who would have beat the crap out of him if they were not brothers. I like Vitali but in all honesty i dont think either brother has got a win against anything like a top fighter in their combined records.

          Comment

          • crold1
            Undisputed Champion
            Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
            • Apr 2005
            • 6354
            • 328
            • 122
            • 19,304

            #95
            Originally posted by uglypug
            Hopkins does have the better legacy, and is an all time great, but if you scrutinize the Klitschko's, then you gotta scrutinize Hopkins too. . . A lot of haters just refuse to give Klitschko's their due props, and I have no clue why. . . When Wladimir is finished and retired - he will be on par with Joe Louis for title defenses. . . Competition notwithstanding, that's RARE. . VERY RARE. . .
            Big difference being Louis did 25 IN A ROW and as sole champ the whole time. Wlad has defended the lineal title 3 times and the IBF 10 in a row. You have to add a PAPER WBO reign to be in the ball park of 25.

            It's rare anyways but it ain't the same (and, before you ask, it's why I separate lineal and alpha stats. Monzon is still the REAL record holder at Middle IMO).

            Comment

            • joseph5620
              undisputed
              Unified Champion - 10,00-20,000 posts
              • Dec 2007
              • 15639
              • 3,089
              • 5,665
              • 71,615

              #96
              Originally posted by crold1
              Big difference being Louis did 25 IN A ROW and as sole champ the whole time. Wlad has defended the lineal title 3 times and the IBF 10 in a row. You have to add a PAPER WBO reign to be in the ball park of 25.
              Originally posted by crold1

              It's rare anyways but it ain't the same (and, before you ask, it's why I separate lineal and alpha stats. Monzon is still the REAL record holder at Middle IMO).
              It's unbelievable how some people don't understand the difference.Or maybe they just don't want to.

              Comment

              • crold1
                Undisputed Champion
                Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
                • Apr 2005
                • 6354
                • 328
                • 122
                • 19,304

                #97
                Originally posted by joseph5620
                [U]

                It's unbelievable how some people don't understand the difference.Or maybe they just don't want to.
                It's not about how great Louis was or whether or not his comp was good or better, which some might try to make it about. It's just the ability to draw a straight line to 25. If it was just a raw defense number, then I think Chavez would have it across three weight classes (have to double check).

                Comment

                Working...
                TOP