Better Legacy, Bernard Hopkins or Wladmir Klitschko?

[Wlad]

Honestly even though im a huge Wlad fan i think i would have to go with Hopkins, his Middleweight reign was long and obviously he broke the record. Not to mention moving up and becoming the oldest champion. Wlad on the other hand has had a great career but i dont see him doing anything spectacular to surpass Hopkins, im sure there will be people on here who disagree with me but i would say Hopkins legacy will be better then both Klitschko's combined.

[Pugilistic™]

Hopkins.

Better accomplishments.

Fought and beat better fighters.

Enough said.

[Sparked_1985]

Klits had no credible foes.

There was a drought of top-level Super Heavy's. Good Big men such as them with less talent could have been dominant world champions if they went through their opponents. Would a prime Golota have lost to any of Vitali's post comeback opposition? I'm not sure.

[cupocity303]

Tough for me as they're two of my favorite Fighters.

I'll have to go with Hopkins though.

[Doctor_Tenma]

Hopkins......

[raf727]

this isn't even a question, hopkins. explain to me again how wlad's legacy even compares? 20 title defenses, 10 years as champ, oldest champion EVER, better resume, the only thing that wlad has done has shown he can adapt, he got exposed with his chin and he knows how to fight without exposing it too much.

joke of a thread

[Dedication]

Undeniably Hopkins!

[-Kev-]

Hopkins has dominated two different weight classes. Has wins over the better opponents. Is The Ring champion in a tougher weight class. And has the superior achievements and accomplishments overall.

[Alx.]

anyone with little knowledge of boxing would go with hopkins....#3 middleweight of all time, reigning middleweight defenses etc

[GG Magic]

Vlad is great but Hopkins.. and easily