Keith Kizer: "Mayweather was AGAINST petitioning the commision for OSDT"
Collapse
-
The truths been out ever since this:
“Manny Pacquiao was just an ordinary fighter and once he got over 25, 26, he became extraordinary. That doesn’t happen in the sport of boxing so it has to be something." -Floyd Mayweather Jr.
This tells you who's doing the ducking..It's been known to most since the beginning..
[IMG][/IMG]Comment
-
The truths been out ever since this:
“Manny Pacquiao was just an ordinary fighter and once he got over 25, 26, he became extraordinary. That doesn’t happen in the sport of boxing so it has to be something." -Floyd Mayweather Jr.
This tells you who's doing the ducking..It's been known to most since the beginning..
Lol, but i mean surely there is nowhere to hide after its been said that mayweather didnt do nsac unlimited testing..but they will still try...lolComment
-
-
Scrambling? A Pac fan talking about scrambling..and YOU at that?
Ok..and? That still doesn't change the fact that Manny was still requesting a 14 day cut off, that he had just rejected. Then wanted back when he knew that it was gone.
You don't? Really? Why not go with the best possible agency to do the testing? Not only that, but how many times had NSAC done unlimited blood testing? Do you know the answers to the those questions? Its not hard to figure out that USADA is/was way more advanced than NSAC.
I'd think it was ****** too, if I didn't understand the parameters of it too. Why throw money into the funding for the NSAC, when you could hire an outside agency with expertise in the field of blood doping. Again, this isn't that hard to grasp.
Maybe because NSAC had never done blood doping tests and USADA has real expertise in that field? You ever thought about that...have you?
Frankly, I don't care what third parties claim. Mayweather asked for advanced testing which includes taking blood and Manny isn't with that, nor has he ever been..thus, the fight hasn't happened. End of.
Listen to yourself. Why does he need a cut off? That's highly su****ious...but its all fine and dandy in the Pacland. Manny wasn't willing to compromise to save the fight in the mediation. And I know that to be true because he last summer he was still talking about a cut off deal that he rejected.
Comment
-
Comment
-
this is where you got it WRONG. the post clearly state "both parties could PETITION the NSAC for the additional testing" and floyd already knew from the past that NSAC would not go for the additional testing. and still the whole process would have to be approved by WADA which pac and arum already said the were against. so this is a moot point trying to prove pac wanted the ost. and kizer stated ost came up out of nowhere which is just not factual at all. roach stated they knew floyd would ask for ost and it wouldnt be a problem. then later he said it was a problem. you can follow the time line of the negotiations at fighthype.com. they show all the lies and blustering of arum and roach.Comment
-
=CONQUERING;11285106
Ok..and? That still doesn't change the fact that Manny was still requesting a 14 day cut off, that he had just rejected. Then wanted back when he knew that it was gone.
You don't? Really? Why not go with the best possible agency to do the testing? Not only that, but how many times had NSAC done unlimited blood testing? Do you know the answers to the those questions? Its not hard to figure out that USADA is/was way more advanced than NSAC.
Surely, NSAC knows what drugs to test for with proper funding, and you conveniently forget mayweather was perfectly fine with even NSAC's standard test until December 2009 (that's right, as late as september 2009 it was still perfectly fine!)
I'd think it was ****** too, if I didn't understand the parameters of it too. Why throw money into the funding for the NSAC, when you could hire an outside agency with expertise in the field of blood doping. Again, this isn't that hard to grasp.
Maybe because NSAC had never done blood doping tests and USADA has real expertise in that field? You ever thought about that...have you?
Frankly, I don't care what third parties claim. Mayweather asked for advanced testing which includes taking blood and Manny isn't with that, nor has he ever been..thus, the fight hasn't happened. End of.
Pacquiao asked mayweather to take the nsac's unlimited blood/urine test and mayweather wanted none of it.
Listen to yourself. Why does he need a cut off? That's highly su****ious...but its all fine and dandy in the Pacland. Manny wasn't willing to compromise to save the fight in the mediation. And I know that to be true because he last summer he was still talking about a cut off deal that he rejected.
Pac asked mayweather to take NSAC test, but agreed to unlimited urine testing on mayweather test + a blood test with 14 day cutoff incl. a test right after the fight.
Mayweather outright refused Pac's test.
And yet, it's pac's fault....hmmmm
I reiterate:
Why use USADA when the NSAC was completely fine with mayweather until 2009? USADA has been known to let even an olympic gold medalist PED user pass their blood test.Last edited by Toyman; 10-12-2011, 08:19 PM.Comment
-
this is where you got it WRONG. the post clearly state "both parties could PETITION the NSAC for the additional testing" and floyd already knew from the past that NSAC would not go for the additional testing. and still the whole process would have to be approved by WADA which pac and arum already said the were against. so this is a moot point trying to prove pac wanted the ost. and kizer stated ost came up out of nowhere which is just not factual at all. roach stated they knew floyd would ask for ost and it wouldnt be a problem. then later he said it was a problem. you can follow the time line of the negotiations at fighthype.com. they show all the lies and blustering of arum and roach.
if they had done a joint-petition to the commission for additional drug testing where they’d cover the cost so we wouldn’t have any budget issues, we would have been happy to do that. We’re still happy to do that. Again, my understanding is Golden Boy, Top Rank, and Pacquiao were in agreement to do that, but Mr. Mayweather decided not to do that, and that’s his right.”
what's the next excuse? mayweather didnt want to cover the cost?Comment
-
Comment