Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Comments Thread For: Floyd Mayweather Talks Pacquiao, Ortiz Fight, More

Collapse
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • #31
    Originally posted by LeadUppercut View Post
    You are a fkn idiot for insinuating that it is more appropriate for Mayweather to "prove it in the courts", than it is for Pacquiao to take a harmless blood test. Moron.
    stop arguing over the same thing you've been arguing for the last 3 years

    its up to Floyd whether he wants the fight or not. The man is a businessman, he makes decisions on whether something is profitable, not whether he thinks a fighter is clean or dirty

    Dont buy into that "cleaning up the sport" mess.

    This is a business decision. If Floyd wants the fight, he will take it after calculating the risks and rewards

    The ball is in Floyd's court. If the fight doesnt happen, he's gonna get blamed not Pac.

    and if he dont, Dont get your feelings hurt over Floyd rejecting the fight, its just business

    Comment


    • #32
      [QUOTE=amayseng;11084805]are you freaking kidding me?????????????????????

      floyd gave the soldiers a tour of his mansion while they are over seas

      WITH FREAKIN BULLETS FLYING OVER THEIR HEADS, BOMBS LANDING BESIDE

      THEM AND WATCHING THEIR FRIENDS DIE IN THEIR ARMS TO PROTECT THIS

      COUNTRY FOR 45,000 DOLLARS A YEAR AND FLOYD SHOWS THEM A 40 MILLION DOLLAR MANSION ?????????????????????????????????????????/



      THE GUY HAS NO TACT, NO CLUE, NO CLASS...

      HE DOESNT GET ANYTHING


      HOW DOES ANYONE LIKE FLOYD MAYWEATHER THE PERSON

      HOW??????????????


      Come on man, the soldiers chose their profession just like floyd chose his. They knew the possibility of war as soon as they joined the military.
      They were via satellite and the interview was at his house. How is that an insult to the soldiers by giving them a tour of his home? The insult would've been not doing the interview at all. Props to him for doing the interview. I'm sure the soldiers didn't feel that way at all.

      Comment


      • #33
        Originally posted by WESS View Post
        Floyd won't get credit for beating Pac. There is too much hate. Pac will be another Ricky Hatton story of "Floyd beat another smaller fighter". The same people who are saying Mayweather is ducking Khan will say "Floyd beat another smaller fighter"...

        Being realistic is saying that it doesn't matter who it is, people just want Floyd beaten. Pac is just the "fad" right now to do it thanks to Bob and his strategic match making of in-house recycled former champions coming off the worst performances of there careers. Let alone Mayweather's left overs in some cases.

        You can say that people will give Floyd credit for beating Pac but thats not being realistic. People just want to see him lose and it doesn't matter who it is and until he does lose people won't give him credit for beating anyone.

        When Mayweather and Pac finally do fight the "fans" will be left feeling cheated, pissed off and left with more hate than ever for Floyd. Which would result to them saying Floyd is NOW ducking (insert name) and the process starts all over again. Trust me, been a fan for years and watched the cycle go on several times.

        In time, history will repeat itself. That's just being realistic.
        One can easily point out that Pac far more proven at WW than Hatton no?

        And, one can also point out that Pac is easily the greatest fighter Floyd has been in the ring with no?

        That can't be said about Hatton, no other Floyd opponent are as great as Pac.

        It will be damn near impossible for Floyd not to get credit for Pac. Matter of fact it's Floyd fans/Pac haters who probably won't give Floyd credit or at the least shouldn't. Because, they keep downplaying Pac career/success and vice versa.

        Of course the focus after will be the next guy that Floyd should fight. But, if Floyd keeps fighting why shouldn't that be the discussion?

        Do you think if Pac beats Floyd and keeps fight that fans won't call far him to fight the next thread? Yea OK...
        Last edited by jrosales13; 09-04-2011, 08:35 PM.

        Comment


        • #34
          Originally posted by LeadUppercut View Post
          You are a fkn idiot for insinuating that it is more appropriate for Mayweather to "prove it in the courts", than it is for Pacquiao to take a harmless blood test. Moron.
          he is willing to take a blood test fkn idiot. and most likely manny was being resistant at first, because floyd and his crack head family accused manny with absolutely no proof, and tried to tarnish his name. pretty bold considering he had just fought a light weight and didn't even make the agreed upon catch weight.
          hence, why manny wanted that clause, so he wouldnt end up wasting his time, because unlike JMM he wouldn't need to go trhough with the fight after a stunt like that. atleast manny made that decision based on the very recent past actions of floyd unlike the steroid ****.

          Comment


          • #35
            Originally posted by jrosales13 View Post
            One can easily point out that Pac far more proven at WW than Hatton no?

            And, one can also point out that Pac is easily the greatest fighter Floyd has been in the ring with no?

            That can't be said about Hatton, no other Floyd opponent are as great as Pac.

            It will be damn near impossible for Floyd not to get credit for Pac. Matter of fact it's Floyd fans/Pac haters who probably won't give Floyd credit or at the least shouldn't. Because, they keep downplaying Pac career/success and vice versa.

            Of course the focus after will be the next guy that Floyd should fight. But, if Floyd keeps fighting why shouldn't that be the discussion?

            Do you think if Pac beats Floyd and keeps fight that fans won't call far him to fight the next thread? Yea OK...


            are you crazy??? did Floyd get credit for beating Oscar? nope he didnt...

            did he get credit for beating hatton? nope he didnt.....

            did he get credit for beating Shane? nope he didnt......

            now what in your mind thinks people will give him credit for beating Manny?

            all of these fighters were dubbed pre-fight as the one to take Mayweather off his stool.

            but after floyd wins, they were washed up, too old, or too small. so just stop.

            Comment


            • #36
              Originally posted by amayseng View Post
              then you dont know your history..

              go back and look at gatti, he was faded from all those wars,

              manny isnt faded, he is still near his peak, gatti wasnt...

              floyd beats manny then he has props, but no props for beating gatti

              be realistic
              I think these other guys set you straight as far as knowing history goes, all I'm saying is Manny has been in a lot of wars man A LOT! And sure Manny isn't as faded as gatti was but there's no denying he was clearly showing signs of wear and tear in his last fight, even though mosley barely engaged manny was not as crisp, cramping, even appeared to be fatigue at times and missing a lot think its safe to say we've all seen the best of a 30+ Pacquiao which was him moving up vs cotto & hatton..

              Comment


              • #37
                Originally posted by GRUSTLER View Post
                It's funny because now that Floyd is talking about working on making the fight happen, Pacquiao fans are talking about "court" and Floyd clearing that up first? Pac fans are suckers. They don't want to see Manny get served in reality. They just like to talk and imagine that Floyd is scared of Pac but when it comes time to make the fight and Floyd is pushing for it then they act like Floyd is bluffing. Pac is the one bluffing and been making excuses for YEARS. Arum is going to have to make the fight or else. Can't keep running the marathon forever.
                I'm courious to see what Bob will say about this.... I wonder if he will now push for the lawsuit more than ever to avoid the fight and tell the media that it's all Floyd's fault etc....

                Either way in the WW division, Mayweather vs Ortiz > Pac vs JMM and if Bob doesnt make the fight next year Mayweather vs Khan > Pac vs (insert name) I think Berto.

                Bob might be pushed into a corner as they're running out of options. Will Bob recycle his guys again? Get a Cotto or Margarito II? Clottey II? Mosley II? Ortiz, only if he loses to Floyd? Not to many options for Pac. No wait MARTINEZ AT JMW?????? oooo never mind. lol

                Bob better man up and make the fight now. Or is USADA still biased? I cant remember with all the excuses....

                Comment


                • #38
                  Originally posted by DoubleMM View Post
                  sucker punch? watch that part again with high volume. floyd clearly says while shane is talking and not fighting "put your hands up".. shane wants to talk and floyd ****s him. that's what fighters do. this isn't a talking contest. props to floyd and shame on you for calling that a sucker punch.
                  shane ? talking about the gatti fight you idiot.
                  and i never said i even had a problem with the punch. i really didnt.
                  only reason i kind of did is because floyd is not a relentless fighter that throws a lot of punches or even has the killer mentality, so that impacts my thought on the punch.
                  but gatti not mosley.

                  Comment


                  • #39
                    guys please. let's move on and let's leave the fraud alone. it's so clear he's so scared of the pacman. like i repeatedly said, this fight ain't gonna happen. fraud and his dumb *****s will always find something to b1tch about to stop this fight from happening.

                    pac will sign a million ost contracts and it's never going to be enough. they'll most likely request ost spies in pac's camp as their next excuse for not fighting pacman. just watch.

                    Comment


                    • #40
                      Originally posted by WESS View Post
                      This is boxing, fights take place in a BOXING RING and you talking about "court"?

                      COURT? COURT????? you talking about COURT? Court? court.............. you talking about court? court????????? court...............?


                      COURT?..... you talking about COURT??????? COURT????

































                      court?
                      FRAUD seems to have an AVERSION, to Fighting Pac.....
                      Boy knows ....when the 0 goes, he's YESTERDAYS NEWS!!!
                      "BRAND" is where it belongs in the TOILET, Marketability NO MAS!!!
                      Last edited by jbpanama; 09-04-2011, 08:53 PM.

                      Comment

                      Working...
                      X
                      TOP